Sum of arbitrary vertex to midpoint vectors

Joffan
Messages
473
Reaction score
13
I was looking at a homework question posted here requiring proof that the vectors from the vertices of a triangle to the midpoint of the opposite edge sum to zero, and it struck me that there is a more general property:

Consider a set of points, \{A_0, A_1, \ldots A_n\}. The midpoint of ##A_k## and ##A_{k+1}## is denoted by ##a_k##, with ##a_n## as the midpoint of ##A_n## and ##A_0##.

Now form a set of ##n## vectors defined by \stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_ra_s} such that each vertex and each midpoint is used once by a vector in the set.

Now that set of vectors will sum to zero.

--------------------------

Sketch of messy proof
First step - the midpoints are a distraction. ##\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_ra_s} = \stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_rA_s} + \stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_sa_s} = \stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_rA_s }+ \frac{1}2\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_sA_{s+1}}##, so the vector sum contains a scaled loop from the midpoint steps which sums to zero.

Next step - The remaining vectors form a set of closed loops which also sum to zero.

Improvements on this welcome...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The set of points A_k and a_k may be considered vectors from origon. So the n vectors you describe are on the form a_s-A_r, where s and r ranges from 0 to n with r depending on s via some bijection (<-- I assume this is what you mean).

a_k may be written as \frac{1}{2}(A_k+A_{k+1}), where indices are considered modulo n+1.

By writing out entire the sum, we get exactly 0.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Nice and neat. Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top