Sum of Series: 1/(1.3.5)+1/(3.5.7)+1/(5.7.9)+...n Terms

  • Thread starter Thread starter lakshya91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum Terms
lakshya91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
sum up the series :
1/(1.3.5)+1/(3.5.7)+1/(5.7.9)+.......n terms.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The general term of the series is:

<br /> a_{n} = \frac{1}{(2 n - 1)(2 n + 1)(2 n + 3)}, \ n \ge 1<br />

It can be represented in terms of partial fractions:

<br /> a_{n} = \frac{A}{2 n - 1} + \frac{B}{2 n + 1} + \frac{C}{2 n + 3}<br />

Find A, B and C!

After you do that, notice that the denominator of the second term is just that of the first term evaluated for n + 1 and the third is for n + 2. You can use some trick after that which is pretty common to simplify the n-th partial sum of the series

<br /> S_{n} = \sum_{k = 1}^{n} {a_{k}}, \ n \ge 1<br />
 
Dickfore said:
The general term of the series is:

<br /> a_{n} = \frac{1}{(2 n - 1)(2 n + 1)(2 n + 3)}, \ n \ge 1<br />

It can be represented in terms of partial fractions:

<br /> a_{n} = \frac{A}{2 n - 1} + \frac{B}{2 n + 1} + \frac{C}{2 n + 3}<br />

Find A, B and C!

After you do that, notice that the denominator of the second term is just that of the first term evaluated for n + 1 and the third is for n + 2. You can use some trick after that which is pretty common to simplify the n-th partial sum of the series

<br /> S_{n} = \sum_{k = 1}^{n} {a_{k}}, \ n \ge 1<br />

hey, i tried this way but it does not worked out for me or may be i do not grasp your solution. Please give me a detailed solution
 
lakshya91 said:
hey, i tried this way but it does not worked out for me or may be i do not grasp your solution. Please give me a detailed solution

It's called a "telescoping" series. Why don't you start by showing us what numerical values you obtained for "A", "B" and "C" in the partial fractions expansion. Then we can tell you if you're on the right track or not.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top