Sum of Two Squares: Intro to Number Theory

AI Thread Summary
Writing an integer as the sum of two squares is rooted in significant theorems, such as Fermat's theorem, which states that primes of the form 4k+1 can be uniquely represented as such. Lagrange's theorem further expands this by asserting that any positive integer can be expressed as the sum of four squares. While there are intriguing properties associated with the sum of squares function, practical applications are limited. The primary motivation for studying this topic in number theory is intellectual curiosity rather than utility. Engaging with these concepts can enhance understanding of mathematical structures and relationships.
matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
Why bother writing a given integer as the sum of two squares? Does this have any practical application? Is there an introduction on a first year number theory course which would motivate students to study the conversion of a given integer to sums of two squares?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is a good deal of material. For instance the corollary to a theorem of Fermat :- "Any prime ##p## of the form ##4k+1## can be represented uniquely as the sum of 2 squares. Or (related) Lagrange's theorem:- "Any positive integer ##n## can be written as the sum of 4 squares, some of which may be 0".
Then there are also many interesting properties of ##r_2(n)## where ##r## is the sum of squares function.
I would recommend you research "representations of integers as sums of squares."
 
matqkks said:
Why bother writing a given integer as the sum of two squares? Does this have any practical application?

It most likely does not. There are applications of number theory, but overall you should take the class mainly because you find it interesting, not because of possible applications.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top