Sum of work = Work done by net force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between work done by multiple forces acting on an object and the net work calculated from the net force. It confirms that summing the work done by individual forces yields the same result as calculating the work done by the net force. Forces acting at acute angles increase net work, while obtuse angles decrease it, with orthogonal forces having no effect. The work-kinetic energy theorem is also affirmed, stating that the change in kinetic energy equals the net work done on the system. Overall, the conclusion is that both methods of calculating work yield the same result.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Suppose you have many forces acting on an object, and the object moves in space in some time interval. Each force has done some work on the object.
Suppose you took all these values for work, added them up, (they are all scalars). You'd obtain a scalar equal to the net work done on the object. Forces that are acute to the object's displacement at some instant tend to increase this net work, whereas forces obtuse tend to decrease this net work. Forces orthogonal to the displacement at an instant do not affect the net work done on the object.

On the other hand, suppose you took each force acting on the object and summed them all up vectorially, obtaining the net force on the object. You then treat this force as a single force, and find the work done by this one force. Would this work be the same as that obtained in the previous answer?

I've been thinking about this, and am pretty sure the answer is yes, but can anyone confirm this with a yes or a no? I don't want any explanations I'll figure those out myself.

Also, in the work-kinetic energy theorem, the change in KE of the object is equal to the net-work done on the system right? The same net work calculated above in two different ways, right?

Just need a confirmation. Thank you all.

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is yes, you're correct (about everything).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top