Summing an Infinite Series: Can We Prove Divergence?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the divergence of the infinite series 1 + (1/2) + (1/3) + (1/4) + ... + (1/n). Participants suggest using the integral test, which is deemed valid for this series despite initial doubts about continuity. A comparison with a smaller divergent series is also mentioned to illustrate the divergence. The argument emphasizes that ignoring the first term and analyzing the remaining series leads to a sum that diverges. Overall, the series is confirmed to be divergent through various mathematical approaches.
Fookie
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1+(1/2)+(1/3)+(1/4)+(1/5)...+(1/n)

can sum one prove this series is divergent?



or just tell me what the expression for sum to infintiy in terms of n is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
replace with a strictly smaller divergent series eg 1+1/2+1/4+1/4+1/8+1/8+1/8+1/8+1/16... or use the integral test.
 
but i thot that the integral test is not valid for series coz the graph of 1/n will not be contiuous :eek:
 
I think you ought to look up the integral test and see what it says. The integral test is a perfectly valid way to prove this result.
 
Fookie said:
1+(1/2)+(1/3)+(1/4)+(1/5)...+(1/n)

can sum one prove this series is divergent?

Forget the first term (1), and observe that:

1/2+1/3 + 1/4+1/5+1/6+1/7 + 1/8+1/9+1/10+1/11+1/12+1/13+1/14+1/15 +...>

2*1/4 + 4*1/8 + 8*1/16 +... =

1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 +...


Is it enough ?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top