I Summation Equality: Is it Me or Author?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter jenny_shoars
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
jenny_shoars
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm doing my first paper review and an equation is holding me up. I can't tell if I'm just missing something silly or if the author made a mistake.

Given that:
\sum_{n=1}^{N}s_{n} = 1
The author says that:
\sum_{n=1}^{N}(s_{n} - \frac{1}{N})^{2} = \sum_{n=1}^{N}s_{n}^{2} - \frac{1}{N}
I seem to be having some trouble getting this to work. Am I just missing something? Or is this the author's mistake? Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jenny_shoars said:
I seem to be having some trouble getting this to work.
Seems fine to me. Have you tried expanding the square or anything?
 
Dragon27 said:
Seems fine to me. Have you tried expanding the square or anything?
I did, but still didn't seem to get it to come out right. But, now that I know it's just me, I'll figure it out. Thanks!
 
jenny_shoars said:
Or is this the author's mistake?
No.

Dragon27 said:
Have you tried expanding the square or anything?
Good suggestion.
 
jenny_shoars said:
I did, but still didn't seem to get it to come out right. But, now that I know it's just me, I'll figure it out. Thanks!

Keep in mind that for a constant term ##k## , ##\sum_{k=1}^N k = Nk##.
 
Sorry, I discovered my error very shortly after reading Dragon27's reply. I had made a very simple mistake where I wrote \frac{N}{N^2}=N. Just not enough sleep I guess.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top