How to Write the Result of a Squared Summation Notation After Multiplication?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LordCalculus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the result of a squared summation notation after multiplication. The original expression, (∑_{i=1}^{n} x_{i})^2, is already in summation notation. Participants explore the expanded forms for different values of n, revealing patterns in the coefficients of the resulting polynomial. The conversation also questions whether the goal is to find a non-squared summation equivalent to the original expression. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the desired format for the summation notation.
LordCalculus
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How would I write the result of this in summation notation after multiplying it out?

(\sum^{n}_{i=1} x_{i})^{2}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume you mean:

\left(\sum_{i=1}^n x^i \right)^2
 
It already is in summation notation!

(or, are you trying to come up with a summation equal to this, in which the result is not squared?)


in the form of:

\sum_{i=a}^b f(x,i)
 
Last edited:
For n=1, you have (x^1)^2 = x^2[/tex]<br /> <br /> For n=2, you get (x^1 + x^2)^2 = x^2 + 2x^3 + x^4[/tex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; For n=3, you get x^2 + 2x^3 + 3x^4 + 2x^5 + x^6[/tex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; For n=4, you get x^2 + 2x^3 + 3x^4 + 4x^5 + 3x^6 + 2x^7 + x^8[/tex]&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; Notice any pattern?&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; Are you&amp;amp;amp;#039;re looking for the summation notation for this series, given n?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top