- #1

- 16

- 0

n

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- #1

- 16

- 0

n

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

Mathematics news on Phys.org

- #2

- 321

- 64

The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##

- #3

- 16

- 0

Oh okay. The lower bound is the index origin and doesn't matter if it is negative?Gene Naden said:The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##

n

∑ 3

k=-1

3+3+...=3(n+2)

- #4

- 321

- 64

Correct!

- #5

Mentor

- 8,345

- 5,345

To summarise,

$$

\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)

$$

for constant ##c##.

$$

\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)

$$

for constant ##c##.

- #6

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,226

- 6,918

i.e. one is counting fence posts, not sections of wire.DrClaude said:To summarise,

$$

\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)

$$

for constant ##c##.

Share:

- Replies
- 40

- Views
- 732

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 689

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 622

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 918

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 705

- Replies
- 35

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 751

- Replies
- 47

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 773

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 600