Summing a Series: Grouping Terms Legit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
Grouping terms in a series can affect the sum, particularly in alternating series where the order of addition matters. For finite series, grouping terms is generally acceptable, but for infinite series, it can lead to different results depending on how terms are grouped. A convergent series has a limit for its partial sums, while an absolutely convergent series allows for rearrangement of terms without changing the sum. The discussion highlights that certain groupings can demonstrate a series is not absolutely convergent, as seen in the example of the alternating series 1, -1, 1, -1, which oscillates and does not converge. Understanding the concepts of convergence and absolute convergence is crucial for correctly summing series.
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
If one was to sum a series by grouping each two terms would that be legtimate?

i.e if you have an alternating series than grouping two terms would not be would it? i.e 1,-1,1,-1... would sum to 0 if you grouped them or 1 depending on how you group it.

Sometimes the only way to write a series under a summation sign is to group two elements in the series together.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For a finite series, you would be fine.

For an infinite series, not so much. The relevant things to look up are:

Convergent series
Absolutely convergent series

Basically, a convergent series has a limit of its partial sums (meaning you can't just skip by twos) that exists. If a series is absolutely convergent, the sum of the absolute values of the terms converges... and it turns out if it's absolutely convergent, you can re-arrange the terms (otherwise you can't).
 
The sum of an infinite series, if it is convergent, is defined to be the limit of the partial sum S_n as n tends to infinity.

In this case, the partial sums take the form 1, 0, 1, 0...,1,0,...
 
They say the series does not converge because it oscillates.

In fact showing that groups terms in certain ways leads to different answers is a technique used to show some series are not absolutely convergent. The converse is not true though, showing certain groupings give the same answer does not mean it has absolute convergence, since there would be an infinite number of groupings possible.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top