Schools SUNY Albany College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying to the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering (CNSE) at SUNY Albany for a PhD in Nanoscience. Participants express curiosity about the program's acceptance rate, noting its relatively new status and focus on near-term commercial applications. One contributor estimates the acceptance rate at around 25%, based on historical data of approximately 180 students admitted over 4.5 years, with around 150 applicants annually. A GPA of 3.5 or higher is suggested as a competitive benchmark for applicants. The program's strong facilities are highlighted as a benefit, although some express interest in more fundamental research. The lack of publicly available acceptance rates is criticized for potentially misleading prospective students about their chances of admission.
daveyman
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
I want to apply to the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering at SUNY Albany for a PhD in Nanoscience. Does anyone know anything about how difficult it is to get into this program? I know it is relatively new, but I have no concept of acceptance rate. Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I go to school right down the road (literally) from them. I have visited them a few times and talked with a few professors there. It seems that most of their work is for near-term commercial applications. As you noted it's a relatively new (and growing) program.

My impression is that it's competitive, but not nearly as much as most other schools. If you have a decent (> 3.5) GPA and GRE's, I'd think you would have a good shot. I don't have any quantitative data though... this is just based on my impressions from discussions with the faculty there.
 
qpd,

Thanks for your reply! This is very helpful information. I'm a physics major with a GPA around 3.6, so I'm thinking I probably have a shot. I realize that most of their research is for near-term commercial applications, but that's also how they are able to have such incredible facilities. Personally, I'm interested in slightly more fundamental research, but I love the fact that I won't have to worry about equipment availability.
 
Since this is a top hit on Google, I thought I would update this thread.

Like many graduate programs, the actual acceptance rate is kept secret. The people who decide to keep this information secret think that this will allow them to get a better pool of candidates. In reality, it means that students who might have eliminated themselves through self-selection are left naive, forced to pay costly application fees to schools where admission is statistically improbable for them.

With CNSE, however, it is pretty easy to get a rough idea of what the acceptance rate is. The school has only been accredited for 4.5 years. The total number of students that were accepted into the program during that time frame was roughly 180. This means that about 40 students were admitted each year. The number of applicants at schools comparable to the CNSE is about 150.

Using these parameters, the acceptance rate is about 25%. Since the college is expanding, the actual acceptance rate may be slightly higher, but 25% is probably a good lower bound.

If anyone else would like to add some information that I may have missed, it is certainly welcome.
 
I'm also interested in this for grad. Not sure when the site was last updated but csne.albany.edu strongly recommends a min 3.0.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top