'Super School' without playground

  • Thread starter Hootenanny
  • Start date
  • Tags
    School
In summary, the most expensive state school in the UK, Peterborough's Thomas Deacon Academy, will not have an outdoor space for students when it opens in September. Head Alan McMurdo believes the public wants maximum learning, but some are concerned about the lack of physical activity facilities in UK schools. Others argue that students should be able to sit through the day without needing outdoor breaks. Despite this, the school will have sports fields for team activities.
  • #1
Hootenanny
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
9,623
9
BBC News said:
The most expensive state school in the UK will not have an outdoor space for students when it opens in September.
Alan McMurdo, head of Peterborough's £46.4m Thomas Deacon Academy, said: "I think what the public want is maximum learning."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambridgeshire/6629655.stm"

Comments...?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Shame that! Not a school I would want to attend.

While I enjoyed learning in the classroom or studying/reading in the library, I also needed to get outside and burn off energy.
 
  • #3
I can't imagine high school students being capable of sitting through several hours of work without going outside. I myself need a break every few hours where I can just walk around outside, otherwise my concentration goes out the window.

Some pictures of the new development; http://www.deaconsschool.co.uk/features/multipage/?mpid=10 Looks more like an office block to me rather than a school.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
The sports and physical activity facilities in Uk schools have been systematically dismantled over the past 20 years. One thing I admire in the American system is the seemingly equal emphasis on mental and physical activity, and with the increasing waitslines of the people in the UK one would think that they should be heading in the opposite direction.

EDIT: Yey congrats on gold status Hoot!
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Some of favorit classes were held outside on the lawn in good weather. I can't imagine being inside all day. Poor kids.
 
  • #6
Kurdt said:
The sports and physical activity facilities in Uk schools have been systematically dismantled over the past 20 years. One thing I admire in the American system is the seemingly equal emphasis on mental and physical activity, and with the increasing waitslines of the people in the UK one would think that they should be heading in the opposite direction.

EDIT: Yey congrats on gold status Hoot!

The US has been slowly slacking off on its Physical Education Programs these days as well, especially in high school. Hopefully this trend won't last.

Welcome to the Gold Club!
 
  • #7
At my high school, we were never allowed to go outside unless it was for gym class. Maybe its different in the UK and other parts of the US, but not in my school district; however, we did have sports fields for school teams. (I played baseball). So they should have something for sports teams.
 
  • #8
Kurdt said:
EDIT: Yey congrats on gold status Hoot!
G01 said:
Welcome to the Gold Club!
Cheers guys! :biggrin:
 
  • #9
cyrusabdollahi said:
At my high school, we were never allowed to go outside unless it was for gym class. Maybe its different in the UK and other parts of the US, but not in my school district; however, we did have sports fields for school teams. (I played baseball). So they should have something for sports teams.
I went to a large high school and during the lunch period, we could go outside. The lunchroom/cafeteria was between two wings (buildings) of class rooms.

We also had a mandatory gym class. I played the usual team sports for class, but in my senior year, I preferred long distance running and weight training. Most of the time at lunch though, I'd spend time reading in the library.

Congrats on the gold Hoot. Lookin' good man. :biggrin:
 
  • #10
cyrusabdollahi said:
At my high school, we were never allowed to go outside unless it was for gym class. Maybe its different in the UK and other parts of the US, but not in my school district; however, we did have sports fields for school teams. (I played baseball). So they should have something for sports teams.

That's how my high school was set up as well. Once you were out of elementary school, they didn't think you needed recess anymore, and I tend to agree. We did still have gym class, which depending on the activity and weather would be held outside as often as possible, but that was it. By the time you're in high school, you should be able to sit through the day with just the passing time between classes to stretch, or else you're in a big shock when you graduate and need to know how to sit still for a job all day.

Of course, I don't know what the school day is like in the UK. When I was in high school, we were done for the day at 3 PM, so still plenty of daylight left, even in the winter, to get outside and be active after you got home.

I also agree that they should at least have an outdoor field for team sports or activities for gym class so the students get SOME exercise during the day and learn teamwork, but it doesn't need to be elaborate, and certainly doesn't require fancy park-like settings or anything.
 
  • #11
I used to hide inside the building and read during recess during elementary school. I also got my mom to get me a doctor's note excusing me from PE fom middle school up, I just wasn't into chasing after balls. The only thing I liked was calisthenics.
 
  • #12
cyrusabdollahi said:
At my high school, we were never allowed to go outside unless it was for gym class. Maybe its different in the UK and other parts of the US,

Yea, it seems like it's very different over here. We were actively encouraged to go outside during breaks and lunch times. I guess the teachers believed that fresh air is good for kids-- English high schools age from 11 through 16 (Im not sure what the age range is over in the US). I think another reason for students being encouraged to go outside is that children are less likely to misbehave if they're outside playing football, or sat around on benches, than locked up in a classroom. I also imagine that the average US high school is bigger than the average English high school, and so there are more places for students to go, indoors. In my school, if we weren't allowed outside, then we'd have to either sit in classrooms, in the small, poky library, or in the dinner hall that wasn't big enough to seat everyone at once! The latter may be another reason we were encouraged outside.

Moonbear said:
Of course, I don't know what the school day is like in the UK. When I was in high school, we were done for the day at 3 PM, so still plenty of daylight left, even in the winter, to get outside and be active after you got home.
Sounds pretty much the same as here. We used to start at 9 and finish at about 3.15; although I think at my school the school day's been extended due to complaints that there wasn't enough actual lesson time!
 
  • #13
Moonbear said:
By the time you're in high school, you should be able to sit through the day with just the passing time between classes to stretch, or else you're in a big shock when you graduate and need to know how to sit still for a job all day.
You stay inside all day at your job!? Don't they give you any breaks!?

I think the only job I had where I stayed inside through the whole work day was the year I spent in Alaska. Even then, as long as the temperature was 20 below or higher, I'd have to walk the mile from work to the dorms at least once in a while. In fact, I think staying inside so much (plus the constant darkness) had a lot to do with why the winters could get so depressing.
 
  • #14
Moonbear said:
That's how my high school was set up as well. Once you were out of elementary school, they didn't think you needed recess anymore, and I tend to agree. We did still have gym class, which depending on the activity and weather would be held outside as often as possible, but that was it. By the time you're in high school, you should be able to sit through the day with just the passing time between classes to stretch, or else you're in a big shock when you graduate and need to know how to sit still for a job all day.
I don't know about you but there's noway I could sit in the same place all day, I'd go crazy! In my high school we were forbidden from being inside at lunch unless it was raining. At one point to enforce this rule, the teachers decided to lock all the doors into the school at lunch times, except for one corridor which housed the toilets which the whole school (some 1500+ students) were expected to use.
Astronuc said:
We also had a mandatory gym class. I played the usual team sports for class, but in my senior year, I preferred long distance running and weight training. Most of the time at lunch though, I'd spend time reading in the library.
We had two compulsory sport sessions a week, although in my final year I opted for a GCSE in Phys. Ed. so I got six hours a week of sport.
Astronuc said:
Congrats on the gold Hoot. Lookin' good man. :biggrin:
Cheers Astro, I'm catching up to you with the medals now...:rolleyes:
 
  • #15
I thought the schedule at my high school was awesome. Classes started pretty early, I think around 7, then we had 2 classes, and then a 15 minute break, then 2 more classes and a 20min break, and then the last 2 classes. We had no lunch (one could easily eat during the second break, which many people did), but we got out of school at 1:30 which was awesome! Unfortunately I think they recently changed the schedule to the more traditional 7:30 - 3 (with a real lunch period). PE was required for our freshman year only, though one can easily join the sports teams, or take a class on weightlifting.
 
  • #16
I didn't see if this was asked yet but...

The article stated that there would be no "outside" playground. THere was no implication that the school was deleting all athletics and all play time, was there? Can anyone clarify this point?
 
  • #17
Chi Meson said:
I didn't see if this was asked yet but...

The article stated that there would be no "outside" playground. There was no implication that the school was deleting all athletics and all play time, was there? Can anyone clarify this point?
Good point Chi, I didn't think about that. According to their website (http://www.thomasdeaconacademy.com/page_viewer.asp?section=Sports+in+the+Academy&sid=59) , there are still compulsory PE lessons and a range of sports in which students can participate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
Stupid.

And it's not like there's a lack of space in that part of the UK.

Schools should be for much more than just learning.

This whole emphasis/drive towards learning these days really gets my goat.

School should be about enjoying oneself -- not just about learning.

And what's wrong with not being good at something.

Not everyone should go on to higher education.

I really hate the way that for some countries it's all about learning -- they're just mass producing a bunch of robots.

There has to be a certain amount of natural ability which you can't learn from books.

We don't need this kind of learn, learn, learn attitude in the UK!

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

[/rant]
 

1. What is the purpose of creating a 'Super School' without a playground?

The purpose of a 'Super School' without a playground is to focus on academic learning and development by eliminating distractions and potential safety hazards that a traditional playground may present. This type of school may also offer alternative forms of physical activity, such as indoor sports or structured movement breaks.

2. Will the lack of a playground have a negative impact on children's physical health?

While a playground can certainly contribute to physical health, it is not the only factor. A 'Super School' without a playground can still promote physical activity through other means, such as physical education classes, sports teams, and organized recess activities. Additionally, the focus on academic learning can also benefit a child's overall well-being.

3. How will the absence of a playground affect social interactions and development?

Social interactions and development are important for a child's overall development, but a playground is not the only setting where these skills can be fostered. A 'Super School' without a playground can provide other opportunities for children to interact and develop social skills, such as through group projects, team sports, and extracurricular activities.

4. Are there any potential drawbacks to a 'Super School' without a playground?

One potential drawback could be limited physical activity options, as children may not have the opportunity to engage in unstructured play on a playground. However, this can be mitigated by providing alternative forms of physical activity and incorporating movement breaks throughout the day.

5. How can schools ensure that children still have opportunities for outdoor play and fresh air?

Even without a traditional playground, a 'Super School' can provide outdoor play and fresh air opportunities through field trips, nature walks, and outdoor learning activities. Additionally, incorporating outdoor breaks and recess periods into the daily schedule can also give children the chance to get some fresh air and sunlight.

Back
Top