Superconducting induction coil

AI Thread Summary
Applying alternating flux to a superconducting coil induces a current, but unlike conventional coils, there is no sustained emf needed to maintain that current due to the unique properties of superconductors. Once established, the current persists indefinitely without the need for continuous emf, as superconductors behave like ideal lossless coils. The low mass of conduction electrons allows for rapid induction of large currents from brief time-varying flux. A notable demonstration of this phenomenon is a superconducting washer that levitates above a bar magnet, showcasing Lenz's Law in action. Understanding these principles is crucial for addressing challenges like eddy currents in superconducting cables used in high-current applications.
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
Looked at Maxwell's eqns after quite some time,and was wondering, what happens if we apply an alternating flux to a superconducting coil? An emf should be produced, but there's actually no emf in a superconductor!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, a superconducting coil behaves more or less just like an ideal lossless coil. If the coil is part of a closed circuit you will induce a current.
Although -depending on the exact layout= flux quantization might also be important which course wouldn't be the case for a normal circuit.
 
double post...
 
See Meissner Effect in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect
Read about Type I and Type II superconductors in
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/meis.html
and
http://www.superconductors.org/
During ramp-up of magnetic fields in magnets with superconducting coils, eddy currents induced by the emf within the multi-wire superconducting cable (often carrying over 10,000 amps) is a serious problem, and special coatings on the individual wires have been developed to minimize them.
Bob S
 
vin300 said:
Looked at Maxwell's eqns after quite some time,and was wondering, what happens if we apply an alternating flux to a superconducting coil? An emf should be produced, but there's actually no emf in a superconductor!

Actually, there is. It's what engenders the current in the coil. Note, however, that it is not what maintains the current, once the current has been established. A nonzero emf is necessary to maintain an established current (against ohmic resistance) only in the case of non-superconducting coils. Owing to the low mass of conduction electrons, only a very brief time-varying flux is normally required to engender large currents in superconducting coils. And in the case of a superconducting coil, these currents will persist indefinitely after the flux has stopped varying in time. One of my favorite demonstrations is where a superconducting washer is dropped down on a bar magnet. Current is engendered in the washer as the magnetic flux through it varies in time. The direction of the current is such that its own magnetic field opposes the external field that set it up (Lenz's Law). Once the current has become great enough, the washer stops descending and "floats" indefinitely, part way down the bar magnet, seemingly defying gravity.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top