Superluminal speeds -- Princeton study year 2000

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a Princeton study from 2000 that reported a light pulse traveling through laser-excited cesium atoms arriving significantly earlier than expected, suggesting superluminal speeds. This phenomenon raises questions about the nature of group and phase velocities, which differ in dispersive media but are the same in a vacuum. The analogy of ripples on a pond is used to explain these concepts, but confusion arises regarding the speed of individual ripples versus the group. The poster seeks clarification on these complex topics and expresses puzzlement over the implications of the findings. Overall, the discussion highlights the intriguing and counterintuitive aspects of light behavior in different mediums.
Glenn G
Messages
113
Reaction score
12
I read an article with this with great interest but also puzzlement. It talked about sending a pulse of light through a section of laser excited Caesium atoms (6cm I think) if traveling at vacuum speeds the pulse should have taken 0.2ns but actually arrived 62ns before it would have done traveling in a vacuum so in a sense traveling at -300x the speed of light in a vacuum or leaving the gas cell before it arrived? This completely baffles me!
It also went on to say about the difference between group and phase velocities and that in a vacuum these are the same but in a dispersive medium not, it did try and explain group and phase velocity by talking about ripples on a pond and that phase velocity is like observing an individual ripple racing along whereas group velocity is like other ripples as a whole moving at what seems a slower speed. I didn't get this analogy as if wavelength stays the same then surely all the ripples individually or as a group are all moving at the same speed.
Any learned insight please on any of this greatly appreciated
Glenn.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top