Superposition for dependent sources and Pspice

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the use of PSpice for analyzing circuits with dependent sources, specifically addressing homework problems involving dependent current sources. Users express confusion regarding the syntax for implementing dependent sources in PSpice, contrasting it with their experiences in LTSpice. Key calculations involve determining maximum currents through resistors using nodal analysis and mesh analysis, with specific values such as 200mA for a 100 ohm resistor and 100mA for a 25 ohm resistor being discussed. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying circuit analysis techniques to derive accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dependent current sources in circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with PSpice syntax for circuit simulation
  • Knowledge of nodal and mesh analysis techniques
  • Basic concepts of Ohm's Law and current division
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "PSpice dependent current source syntax" for accurate implementation
  • Study "Nodal analysis in circuit theory" to enhance problem-solving skills
  • Learn "Mesh analysis techniques" for circuit analysis in PSpice
  • Explore "Current division in resistive circuits" to understand maximum current calculations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in simulating circuits with dependent sources in PSpice.

  • #61
DODGEVIPER13 said:
The previous Ix =0 which is lower so should I use that however that wouldn't make sense because that would mean negative current.

I believe the problem wanted the largest positive current. .125A is larger than 0A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Ah ok thanks
 
  • #63
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Ok man well if you are not tired I have this problem https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=676267 posted in calculus it was suppose to be in engineering but I posted it wrong it has my work for 2

I don't follow the work that you posted there; there are no comments accompanying the equations to explain what you are attempting to do in each step. It would help if you could elucidate your attempt.
 
  • #64
Ok so don't follow the (1) at the top, it starts at (2). From the first equation with the 3A source removed -8+3ix'+3ix'+2ix'=0 I solve for ix'=1A. Then I remove the 8v source and get ( v''/3)+((v''-2ix'')/3)=4 and relate the dependent source to v'' with v''=-2ix'' solve for ix'' which I find to be -2A and then plug into my formula for Ix=Ix'+Ix'' and I get 1+-2=-1A
 
  • #65
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Ok so don't follow the (1) at the top, it starts at (2). From the first equation with the 3A [4 amp source] source removed -8+3ix'+3ix'+2ix'=0 I solve for ix'=1A.
Okay
Then I remove the 8v source and get ( v''/3)+((v''-2ix'')/3)=4 and relate the dependent source to v'' with v''=-2ix'' solve for ix'' which I find to be -2A and then plug into my formula for Ix=Ix'+Ix'' and I get 1+-2=-1A

Why would you write v''=-2ix'' ? One is a node voltage and the other a dependent supply voltage, and they are separated by a resistor.

What you want is to replace v'' with some function of Ix''. How is Ix'' related to v'' ?
 
  • #66
Uh I have no idea that how the book did it I assumed sice they were in parallel or something
 
  • #67
Hmm I was thinking could it be v''/3=-2Ix so that when I sole I get Ix'' to be -(6/7) which when added to 1 A I get (1/7) for Ix
 
  • #68
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Hmm I was thinking could it be v''/3=-2Ix so that when I sole I get Ix'' to be -(6/7) which when added to 1 A I get (1/7) for Ix

Nope. Look at the diagram and where Ix is. How is it related to the node voltage? It has nothing (directly) to do with the dependent source. How would you write Ix if you were performing nodal analysis?
 
  • #69
Ok so 3Ix+4=I1
 
  • #70
Oh wait could it be 3ix+4+2ix(1)=0
 
  • #71
No, you want to relate Ix to the node voltage. What term wold you include in a node equation for the current in the Ix branch?
 
  • #72
-8+3 Ix=0
 
  • #73
DODGEVIPER13 said:
-8+3 Ix=0

Isn't the 8V source removed (suppressed) at this point?
 
  • #74
Oh yah good point so could it be v''=-3Ix
 
  • #75
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Oh yah good point so could it be v''=-3Ix

Yup, could be!
 
  • #76
Heh good because I solved it out and found Ix''=-1.5 and Ix=-.5A
 
  • #77
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Heh good because I solved it out and found Ix''=-1.5 and Ix=-.5A

Yup. That's it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
3K