Superpositon of energies vs. Superposition of forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the superposition of energies and the superposition of forces, questioning whether they can be mathematically equivalent. The original poster expresses skepticism about their mutual inclusivity, particularly when considering potential energies that decrease with distance. Participants clarify that the gradient of a sum of energies can be expressed as the sum of the gradients of individual energies. The conversation also touches on Lagrange points, explaining that objects at these points experience a balance of forces in a rotating reference frame. Ultimately, the dialogue emphasizes the complexities of these concepts in physics.
kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
I cannot see how the two can be mutually inclusive. If you super impose particles with potential energies that fall off as 1/r that are homogeneously distributed through space then take the gradient of them, I hardly believe that they will result in the exactly the same thing than if you take the 1/r^2 distance for each one.

Must superposition of forces be mathematical equivalent to superposition of energies, without exception? I have a feeling they clash and contradict each other. Can someone let me know how, why? Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
kmarinas86 said:
I cannot see how the two can be mutually inclusive. If you super impose particles with potential energies that fall off as 1/r that are homogeneously distributed through space then take the gradient of them, I hardly believe that they will result in the exactly the same thing than if you take the 1/r^2 distance for each one.

Must superposition of forces be mathematical equivalent to superposition of energies, without exception? I have a feeling they clash and contradict each other. Can someone let me know how, why? Thanks

Hi kmarinas86! :smile:

Gradient(a) = ( ∂a/dx , ∂a/∂y , ∂a/∂z ) …

Gradient(a + b + c + … ) = Gradient(a) + Gradient(b) + Gradient(c) + … :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi kmarinas86! :smile:

Gradient(a) = ( ∂a/dx , ∂a/∂y , ∂a/∂z ) …

Gradient(a + b + c + … ) = Gradient(a) + Gradient(b) + Gradient(c) + … :smile:

I had trouble understanding how L4 and L5 points works if they were simply the superposition of forces.

How does an object orbit an L4 and L5 point work in relation to the superposition of forces and energies? Thanks for your participation so far! :)
 
Lagrange points

kmarinas86 said:
I had trouble understanding how L4 and L5 points works if they were simply the superposition of forces.

How does an object orbit an L4 and L5 point work in relation to the superposition of forces and energies? Thanks for your participation so far! :)

Hi kmarinas86! :smile:

It's the same as a geostationary satellite … the geostationary satellite feels a force, but a "laboratory" frame, rotating with the earth, regards it as stationary.

Similarly, the L4 etc points are orbiting the sun as fast as we are … they're only stationary as seen in the appropriately rotating frame …see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_points
As seen in a rotating reference frame with the same period as the two co-orbiting bodies, the gravitational fields of two massive bodies combined with the centrifugal force are in balance at the Lagrangian points, allowing the third body to be stationary with respect to the first two bodies.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top