Supersonic Flow Before and After the Shockwave

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of airspeed (Mach number) before and after a compression shockwave during supersonic flight. Participants explore the possibility of creating aerodynamic shapes that could increase the speed of the airflow to a Mach number greater than the freestream Mach number, while avoiding the use of expansion waves. The conversation touches on theoretical, experimental, and practical aspects of supersonic aerodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that after a compression shockwave, the airspeed is always reduced, questioning the feasibility of increasing it beyond the freestream Mach number without using expansion waves.
  • Others argue that while certain aircraft designs, like the Four 593, can achieve high speeds internally, replicating this effect externally on an aircraft would require significant energy input and may not be practically achievable.
  • A participant mentions that combusting fuel externally to reduce shockwaves would be inefficient and may not eliminate the shock entirely, depending on the intended outcome.
  • There are references to historical proposals, such as Barnes Wallis's trans orbital aircraft concept, which involves burning hydrogen fuel in the wake of controlled oblique shock waves.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the theoretical possibility of creating an "expansion shock," citing the second law of thermodynamics and the intrinsic nature of compression shocks in supersonic flight.
  • Discussion includes the idea that atmospheric air behaves differently than a van der Waals gas, and that compression shocks are unavoidable when moving through a gas at supersonic speeds.
  • References to ongoing research in sonic boom reduction and the involvement of companies like Aeron and NASA in exploring these concepts are mentioned.
  • Some participants reflect on the challenges of eliminating shock waves, emphasizing their role in wing lift aerodynamics at supersonic speeds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of viewpoints, with some agreeing on the challenges of eliminating shockwaves while others propose various theoretical approaches. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the feasibility of increasing airflow speed beyond the freestream Mach number or eliminating shockwaves.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific aerodynamic shapes, the theoretical nature of proposed ideas, and the unresolved status of certain mathematical and physical claims regarding shockwave behavior.

8eou8elisi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
After a Compression (Oblique) Shockwave during supersonic flight, the air speed (Mach number) is always reduced. I was wondering if an aerodynamic shape could be created to increase the speed of the affected stream to a Mach number greater than the freestream Mach number. I am looking for an Idea that is not an expansion Wave because it will be difficult if not impossible to create it in front of an aircraft before a compression wave.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Four 593's do this spectacularly in their internals but it takes rather a lot of fuel .

No plausible way of doing same thing over external surfaces of an aircraft . Even if it was theoretically possible there would have to be a very large input of energy into the air flow .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 8eou8elisi
8eou8elisi said:
After a Compression (Oblique) Shockwave during supersonic flight, the air speed (Mach number) is always reduced. I was wondering if an aerodynamic shape could be created to increase the speed of the affected stream to a Mach number greater than the freestream Mach number. I am looking for an Idea that is not an expansion Wave because it will be difficult if not impossible to create it in front of an aircraft before a compression wave.

This is not theoretically possible, as it would require an "expansion shock" to exist, which would violate the second law of thermodynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 8eou8elisi
Barnes Wallis proposed a trans orbital aircraft with propulsion provided at higher Mach numbers by burning hydrogen fuel externally to the aircraft in the wake of controlled oblique shock waves .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 8eou8elisi
The intakes for a jet engine for supersonic flight generally uses shock waves to decrease velocity and raise pressure to levels suitable for the engine .The engine then adds energy to the air flow and it comes out of the exhaust nozzle at higher speeds than it went in at the front end .

Whittle made a considerable study of supersonic flow in variable area ducts with energy addition .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 8eou8elisi
Release shocks exist in solids, Fe for example. They happen due to features in the hugoniot. For Fe it is the alpha epsilon phase transition.
 
Nidum said:
Barnes Wallis proposed a trans orbital aircraft with propulsion provided at higher Mach numbers by burning hydrogen fuel externally to the aircraft in the wake of controlled oblique shock waves .

Do you know where I could find Barnes Wallis research or any of the work he did on the subject you mentioned. Google is not giving me anything of substance.
 
8eou8elisi said:
Do you know where I could find Barnes Wallis research or any of the work he did on the subject you mentioned. Google is not giving me anything of substance.

I doubt whether there is anything much on Google . I heard about his ideas when I was working on jet engine design . I'll see if I can find any references for you in next couple of days .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 8eou8elisi
Doing this by combusting fuel on the exterior of the vehicle would be extraordinarily inefficient, though, and would not get rid of the shock. I suppose it depends on the goal.
 
  • #10
My goal is to form a sound theoretical basis to reduce the Shockwave or completely get rid of it so as to justify an experimental research being done. So at the moment I am just trying to explore ways that have not been explored and also reading up on other people's research for inspiration and to see if I can notice something that might help. Do you guys know of any particular area in this study I could pay much attention to or of any ideas that may yield answers?
 
  • #11
This is already an area of active research. You might try a search for sonic boom reduction or mitigation. I know a company called Aeron plans on releasing a supersonic business jet in the next couple years using some of these ideas and NASA actively pursues these ideas. I believe Boeing is still looking into it as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 8eou8elisi
  • #12
boneh3ad said:
This is not theoretically possible, as it would require an "expansion shock" to exist, which would violate the second law of thermodynamics.
Expansion shocks can exist in certain, rather unusual circumstances. You're right that they aren't really relevant to aircraft flight though.

(For example, http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02511381 )
 
  • #13
cjl said:
Expansion shocks can exist in certain, rather unusual circumstances. You're right that they aren't really relevant to aircraft flight though.

(For example, http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02511381 )

Of course atmospheric air is not a van der Waals gas. In a perfect has, expansion shocks are not possible. I am not on my work network at the moment so I can't see the references in that article, but I'd also be skeptical if it's just a computational study done without experimental validation on such an unusual phenomenon.

I suppose I'll also point out that even if an object was flying at supersonic speed through a van der Waals gas, you'd still get compression shocks since there is no way around the fact that the flow must turn into itself to get out of the way of the body, resulting in compression. There just is no way to move a body through a gas at supersonic speeds without some compressive shock. If there was, we'd have more common supersonic transports by now.
 
  • #14
boneh3ad said:
Of course atmospheric air is not a van der Waals gas. In a perfect has, expansion shocks are not possible. I am not on my work network at the moment so I can't see the references in that article, but I'd also be skeptical if it's just a computational study done without experimental validation on such an unusual phenomenon.

I suppose I'll also point out that even if an object was flying at supersonic speed through a van der Waals gas, you'd still get compression shocks since there is no way around the fact that the flow must turn into itself to get out of the way of the body, resulting in compression. There just is no way to move a body through a gas at supersonic speeds without some compressive shock. If there was, we'd have more common supersonic transports by now.

Yes, of course. I was presenting that as an interesting and unusual exception to the idea that expansion shocks are not possible. You're right that it has no bearing on a perfect gas (or atmospheric air, for that matter), and that even in a Van der Waals gas, you would still have compression shocks ahead of a supersonic object.
 
  • #16
djpailo said:
I remember something about Expansion waves:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prandtl–Meyer_expansion_fan

Whether you could design that to be of some meaningful aerodynamic shape is another story entirely.

You won't encounter such expansion waves external to a body moving my at supersonic speeds without the presence of a shock as well, particularly for any shape expected to generate lift.
 
  • #17
(1) I don't think that trying to actually eliminate the shock waves is a realistic quest .
(2)
boneh3ad said:
You won't encounter such expansion waves external to a body moving my at supersonic speeds without the presence of a shock as well, particularly for any shape expected to generate lift.

Need to stress that mention of lift . At supersonic speeds the shock waves are an intrinsic part of the wing lift aerodynamics .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K