Supersymmetric Composite Models

  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite Models
arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
I have just found a review on this topic by Volkas and Joshi

http://inspirehep.net/record/21549?ln=esBut it is very old... 1988. I was just in the middle of the undergraduate. I know that the topic got some push from Seiberg dualities, but that is still the XXth century. Does anybody know of more recent reviews?

At a first glance, it seems that the idea is to have supersymmetry both in the preons AND in the composites. I am not sure if this is some general theorem of supersymmetry... In which conditions a composite particle is also a piece of a supermultiplet? At least it seems that it works for Goldstone bosons, which have fermionic partners.

With this, it seems that they are able to have zero mass, or very light particles, even if the composite scale is very high. Interesting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for sharing the review! It's great to see that this topic was explored as far back as 1988. I'm sure it has been further explored by now, though. I'm also very intrigued by the idea of having supersymmetry in both preons and composites. Do you know if there have been any more recent reviews or papers discussing this concept?
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top