Supersymmetry and Superparticles

  • Thread starter Thread starter DB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Supersymmetry
DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
In a nutshell, could someone refresh my memory on supersymmetry and superparticles. I have trouble understanding these subjects of string theory.
Let's say we have a fermonic string of spin -1\2. What is it's superparticle's spin? Is it bosonic?

Thanks to all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The theory has strings with fermionic and bosonic degrees of freedom, that is all. No a elementary object being fermioni or bosonic.
 
arivero said:
The theory has strings with fermionic and bosonic degrees of freedom, that is all. No a elementary object being fermioni or bosonic.
What do you mean by degrees of freedom?
 
supersymmetry

The chart available at the following link should be helpful regarding particles, superparticles, and spin:

http://thinkzone.wlonk.com/Physics/PartHyp.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, that helps.
 
Partner-superpartner spin relation?

PhysicsFan said:
The chart available at the following link should be helpful regarding particles, superparticles, and spin:

http://thinkzone.wlonk.com/Physics/PartHyp.htm

According to this chart, the spin of a superpartner is always -1/2 the spin of the "ordinary" partner" except for the higgsino which is +1/2 the spin of the higgs.
I aways wondered why the photino couldn't have a spin of 3/2 instead of 1/2, for example.
Any references or explanations to explain why this is?

TIA

Jim Graber
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
In LQG and LQC there are solutions called "black to white transition". I'll add some references: (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07251 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03872 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06330 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04264 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12823 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07589 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01788 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03027...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Back
Top