Suppose there is a semiconductor with Fermi energy

c299792458
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Suppose there is a semiconductor with Fermi energy $E_f$ and that there are $N$ bound electron states.

I'd like to know why the mean number of excited electrons takes the form \bar n(T)={N\over \exp\beta(\mu-E_f)+1}

where \mu is the chemical potential.

____
I can see that the Fermi Dirac statistics say that for one fermion the mean occupation number is \bar n = {1\over \exp\beta(E-\mu)+1}
I am not sure however as to how for the semi-conductor it should assume the above form. The N is clearly due to the N bound e^- states. I am not quite so confident as to why \mu\to E_f, E\to \mu

Could someone please explain?

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think by E, you mean the top of the valence band?
Every electron that is not bound is excited (or makes a "hole" in the valence band and an electron in the conduction band).
There are N bound states, so the number of excited electron is N* (1- fermi_dirac_dist(E))
mathematically, this is the the same as changing the palces of Ef and E, try it.
By the way, using E as the top of the valence band is an approximation which doesn't work if, for example, the semiconductor is very heavily p-type.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, Giga_Man!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top