Surds as a vector space, but really an analysis question I think

Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,702
Reaction score
1,587
I guess this is a bit of an interdisciplinary post... a friend of mine was looking at surds as a way of making a vector space with a basis as the prime numbers. Here's the construction:

V = {Surds} = {qr|q is rational and positive, r is rational}

The field that V is over is Q

And we defined vector space multiplication and addition (* and +)as follows for vectors p,q and scalars r,s

p+q:= pq
r*p:= pr

and this forms a vector space with the "zero element" as 1 and multiplicative inverses in Q as the additive inverses in V, and the prime numbers form a basis

Now, the motivation here is to study the basis... the first thought was to perform Graham Schmidt orthogonalization (at least on finite subsets). Ok, so we need a norm. Here's what we can glean:

|.|:V->R
|r*p| = |pr| = |r|*|p| = r*|p|
and
|1| = 0
That looks a lot like a logarithm to me actually... are there any other functions that have this property? The problem with having a logarithm for the norm is that to form an orthonormal basis, you need the norms of your basis elements to lie in the field, which in this case is Q, and I don't think there exists a base b such that logbqr is in Q for all qr in V
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It depends what you mean by like a logarithm.
Use the "obvious" norm
||v||=||(2^a)(3^b)(5^c)(7^d)...||=||(a,b,c,d,...||=sqrt[a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+...]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top