Surface current density problem

AI Thread Summary
The surface current density, K, is defined as the current per unit width perpendicular to the flow, expressed by the formula K = v·σ, where σ is the surface charge density. To understand this intuitively, consider a long rectangular sheet of charge moving at a constant speed, where an imaginary line is drawn across its width. As the sheet moves, the charge passing the line can be calculated, leading to the current I = ΔQ/Δt = σvw. This results in the surface current density K being derived as K = I/w = σv. The discussion emphasizes the physical interpretation of the formula and the justification for measuring current through a ribbon of width dl even if the current varies along its length.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
The surface current density, K, is defined as the the current through a unit width perpendicular to the flow. In particular:
K = v\cdotσ
where σ is the surface charge density. Now I have a little trouble understanding this formula intuitively. Can someone describe in pictures how it is interpreted physically?
Also as a side note: Why can you unambigously speak of the current through a ribbon of width dl parallel to the current - what if the current changes as we move parallel to it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to justify that formula is to consider the units: (A/m) = (m/s)(C/m2).

Or: Imagine a long rectangular sheet of charge with width w and uniform surface charge density σ. Draw an imaginary line at right angles across the width of the sheet. Set the sheet in motion with constant speed v while keeping the imaginary line stationary.

In a time interval Δt, a length vΔt of the sheet passes the imaginary line. The total charge contained in that length is ΔQ = (σ)(vΔt)(w). The current passing the imaginary line is I = ΔQ/Δt = σvw. The surface current density along the imaginary line is K = I/w = σv.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Aroldo
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top