Surface definition in crystals question

Useful nucleus
Messages
374
Reaction score
62
I read the following paragraph about surface definition"
"Each surface is specified by at least two pieces of information.Firstly, there are the Miller indices (hkl) of the plane that defines the orientation of the bulk cleavage. Secondly, there is the so-called shift - i.e. the displacement of the plane relative to the unit cell origin. The shift ranges between 0 and 1."

I do not quite understand what the shift means. To me it looks a surface with a shift x (say x >0 ) is equivalent to another surface with different miller indices and shift zero. Am I right here?

In other words , to me it looks unnecessary to use the shift since miller indices are enough to uniqule specify the surface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Miller indices only define the plane orientation. 2 parallel planes have the same Miller indices.

Take a fcc unit cell for example. If you cleave along the (001) plane, you could cut between the first/second or second/third layer. If you just used the Miller indices, there would be no way to distinguish between the 2 surfaces.
 
WHoops, I forgot that the Miller indices by definition have to be relatively prime! Thank you for clarification, it reminded me of the definition :)
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top