Surface Integrals: Flux of F across S

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the surface integral ∫∫S F · dS for the vector field F(x, y, z) = xy i + yz j + zx k over the surface S defined by the paraboloid z = 3 - x² - y², constrained within the square 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, 0 ≤ y ≤ 1. The user attempted to convert the integral into polar coordinates but faced confusion regarding the correct application of the surface integral formula and the limits of integration. The correct approach involves directly using Cartesian coordinates, as the integrand consists of polynomial terms suitable for integration over a square region.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals and vector fields
  • Familiarity with the divergence theorem
  • Knowledge of polar and Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Proficiency in multivariable calculus, specifically integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the divergence theorem and its application to surface integrals
  • Practice evaluating surface integrals in Cartesian coordinates
  • Study the properties of vector fields and their flux across surfaces
  • Explore examples of integrating over different geometric shapes, including squares and circles
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in multivariable calculus, particularly those focusing on surface integrals and vector field analysis. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to clarify the evaluation of flux integrals over specified surfaces.

ryoonc
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the surface integral ∫∫S F · dS for the given vector field F and the oriented surface S. In other words, find the flux of F across S. For closed surfaces, use the positive (outward) orientation.

F(x, y, z) = xy i + yz j + zx k

S is the part of the paraboloid z = 3 - x^{2} - y^{2} that lies above the square 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, 0 ≤ y ≤ 1, and has upward orientation.

Homework Equations


\int \int F\cdot dS = \int \int \left( -P \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} -Q \frac{\partial g}{\partial y} +R \right) dA

The Attempt at a Solution


I've gone over the examples in my calculus book two or three times now and I get confused about a couple things:

dA is r*dr*d\theta, and I replace the x's and y's with rcos\theta and rsin\theta, respectively, and substituting z with the given equation, but I still get a wrong answer. Here's my attempt:

\int \int ( -y(-2x) -x(-2y) +3-x^{2}-y^{2})dA

...and after substituting x and y and z for their polar coordinates and then simplifying, I get:

\int ^{\pi / 2}_{0} \int ^{1}_{0} (3+4r^{2}cos(\theta)sin(\theta)-r^{2})rdrd\theta

I was kind of hoping this would get me the right answer, but it's not (I end up with \frac{5 \pi}{8} + \frac{1}{2}), and I think it has to do with the r domain that I used, or perhaps my entire equation. In any case I'm not sure how to implement the square of length 1 in xy plane domain into my equation. Where have I gone wrong?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ryoonc said:

Homework Statement


Evaluate the surface integral ∫∫S F · dS for the given vector field F and the oriented surface S. In other words, find the flux of F across S. For closed surfaces, use the positive (outward) orientation.

F(x, y, z) = xy i + yz j + zx k
This is your P(x,y)i + Q(x,y)j + R(x,y)k

S is the part of the paraboloid z = 3 - x^{2} - y^{2}

This is your z = g(x,y)

that lies above the square 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, 0 ≤ y ≤ 1, and has upward orientation.

Homework Equations


\int \int F\cdot dS = \int \int \left( -P \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} -Q \frac{\partial g}{\partial y} +R \right) dA

The Attempt at a Solution


I've gone over the examples in my calculus book two or three times now and I get confused about a couple things:

dA is r*dr*d\theta, and I replace the x's and y's with rcos\theta and rsin\theta, respectively, and substituting z with the given equation, but I still get a wrong answer. Here's my attempt:

\int \int ( -y(-2x) -x(-2y) +3-x^{2}-y^{2})dA

Are your P(x,y), Q(x,y) and R(x,y) terms here correct?

...and after substituting x and y and z for their polar coordinates and then simplifying, I get:

Why in the world would you try polar coordinates at this point? The integrand is simple polynomial terms in x and y and you are integrating over a square.​
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K