Surface Tension - Lung Alveoli

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of pulmonary surfactant in lung alveoli, which are likened to bubbles requiring significant pressure to inflate due to the Young-Laplace equation. Surfactant molecules reduce surface tension, facilitating easier inflation of the alveoli. However, as the alveoli expand, the distance between surfactant molecules increases, leading to a rise in surface tension and a decrease in the rate of expansion. This occurs because greater separation allows more alveolar molecules to interact, enhancing their attractive forces. The mathematical connection lies in the effective concentration of surfactant decreasing with expansion, resulting in increased surface tension.
elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
So, the way I understand this is as follows :

The alveoli (pretend they're bubbles) have diameters of the order of microns implying a massive pressure required to inflate them by the Young-Laplace equation.

p_{in}-p_{out}=\frac{2\gamma}{r}

However, the presence of pulmonary surfactant molecules (lets just pretend they're like detergents molecules in washing liquid) can effectively reduce the surface tension at the unexpanded alveoli and hence allow easy inflation.

Now this bit I don't understand :

As the alveoli expand the distance between the individual surfactant molecules on the alveoli increases and hence the surface tension rises again therefore decreasing the rate of expansion.

What is the mathematical connection between surface tension and separation between surfactant molecules ? How can I rationalise the statement in bold ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
elemis said:
So, the way I understand this is as follows :

The alveoli (pretend they're bubbles) have diameters of the order of microns implying a massive pressure required to inflate them by the Young-Laplace equation.

p_{in}-p_{out}=\frac{2\gamma}{r}

However, the presence of pulmonary surfactant molecules (lets just pretend they're like detergents molecules in washing liquid) can effectively reduce the surface tension at the unexpanded alveoli and hence allow easy inflation.

Now this bit I don't understand :

As the alveoli expand the distance between the individual surfactant molecules on the alveoli increases and hence the surface tension rises again therefore decreasing the rate of expansion.

What is the mathematical connection between surface tension and separation between surfactant molecules ? How can I rationalise the statement in bold ?

The surfactant molecules separate the molecules of the alveoli, which are, apparently, highly attractive to one another. However, if the distance between the surfactant molecules increases (i.e., their concentration at the surface decreases), more molecules of alveloi are able to come into contact with one another, and this causes their attractive effect to increase. Just imagine if the concentration of the surfactant molecules was greatly reduced. It would be as if they were not even there.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Chestermiller said:
The surfactant molecules separate the molecules of the alveoli, which are, apparently, highly attractive to one another. However, if the distance between the surfactant molecules increases (i.e., their concentration at the surface decreases), more molecules of alveloi are able to come into contact with one another, and this causes their attractive effect to increase. Just imagine if the concentration of the surfactant molecules was greatly reduced. It would be as if they were not even there.

Chet

Hi Chet,

So to be clear, the alveoli expansion simply results in an drop in the effective concentration (activity) of the surfactant and hence since their surface excess decreases we note an increase in surface tension ?
 
elemis said:
Hi Chet,

So to be clear, the alveoli expansion simply results in an drop in the effective concentration (activity) of the surfactant and hence since their surface excess decreases we note an increase in surface tension ?
That's my understanding of what the statement is saying.

Chet
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top