Surfing with electromagnetic waves

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic waves can accelerate charged objects through momentum transfer, primarily affecting their direction rather than linear speed. The interaction of EM waves with particles is described by Maxwell's equations, which detail how waves reflect off surfaces due to electron oscillations. Unlike gravity, which does not reflect, electromagnetic waves can be absorbed and re-emitted by materials, leading to reflection. Classical electrodynamics alone is insufficient for explaining optical phenomena at the atomic level, necessitating quantum mechanics for a complete understanding. This discussion highlights the complexities of wave interactions and the limitations of classical physics in explaining modern optics.
HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
Let's say I have some source that generates a spherical wave that propagates outwards at the speed of light, and I have a vehicle that is charged.
The wave will accelerate my vehicle periodically and eventually bring it to great speeds.
Does this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spherical wave of what?
Electromagnetic waves are transversal - the main acceleration of your charged object would be sidewards, and changing its direction with the frequency of the electromagnetic wave.
The charged object would absorb or reflect some fraction of the wave, which gives an effective acceleration in the direction of the beam - but you do not need to charge the whole object, everything non-transparent will work. Solar sails use this concept.
 
hmm right.
Actually I'm a bit confused, could someone correct me if I'm wrong.
As i understand it, EM waves are just solutions to maxwells equations and they themselves interact with particles, transferring momentum in the form of a force?
And by the way, why do EM waves reflect off of surfaces? That has always bothered me.Gravity certainly does not reflect off of things, why electromagnetic waves?
 
As i understand it, EM waves are just solutions to maxwells equations

and they themselves interact with particles, transferring momentum in the form of a force?
They can do that.

And by the way, why do EM waves reflect off of surfaces?
As quantum mechanical description: Electrons (and sometimes other particles) can absorb the energy and re-emit it.
As classical description for metals: EM waves can lead to oscillations of electrons in the surface, those emit electromagnetic waves.

You cannot compare electromagnetic waves to gravity in that way. I think gravitational waves can be scattered in material - but gravity is so weak, we cannot even detect the waves themself with current experiments (might change in 2-3 years), so this is just a theoretic thing.
Gravity (as force between matter) does not reflect, and neither do electrostatic forces (as forces between charges)
 
I was hoping for a more elegant classical explanation..but I guess that makes sense.
So basically classical Electrodynamics is not enough to explain optics?
 
It cannot explain atoms or solid objects without effective theories (like a refraction index and so on). As soon as you want to understand that on a microscopic level, you need quantum mechanics.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top