Surjectivity of induced map via hom functor implies injectivity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kreizhn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induced Map
Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let R be an arbitrary ring, B and B' be left R-modules, and i: B' \to B be an R-module morphism. Show that if the induced map i^*: \operatorname{Hom}_R(B,M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(B',M) is surjective for every R-module M, then i: B' \to B is injective.

The Attempt at a Solution



The maps all seem to go the wrong way to use the categorical definition of kernels, so I fear that I must be much trickier about the application and exploit the module structure quite specifically. This would suggest an intelligent choice of M and a morphism B' \to M in order to apply the hypothesis.

In my mind, the only obvious candidate is the projection map \pi: B' \to B'/\ker i. The hypothesis would then suggest that there exists \hat \pi: B \to B'/\ker i such that \hat \pi \circ i = \pi. However, nothing useful seems to come of this. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you take ##M=B^\prime## and take the identity morphism in ##Hom(B^\prime,B^\prime)##?
 
Ah yes excellent. I figured that out today, and could have saved myself a lot of time if I had just looked here first.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top