Suspended Steel Beam: 6000N Max Tension Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter tigerseye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Steel
AI Thread Summary
To determine if either rope supporting a 1000 kg steel beam will break under a maximum tension of 6000N, the forces acting on the system must be analyzed. The total weight of the beam is approximately 10000N, which must be balanced by the vertical components of the tensions in the ropes. The equations derived from the free body diagram are F1 sin[20] + F2 sin[30] = 10000 for vertical forces and F1 cos[20] - F2 cos[30] = 0 for horizontal forces. By solving these equations, the tensions F1 and F2 can be calculated to see if they exceed the maximum tension limit of 6000N. This analysis will confirm whether either rope will break under the given load conditions.
tigerseye
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm having problems with what equation to use for this question:
A 1000 kg steel beam is supported by two ropes. Each rope has a maximum sustained tension of 6000N. Does either rope break?
 

Attachments

  • steel beam.JPG
    steel beam.JPG
    7.4 KB · Views: 2,351
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram.
The two tensions are directed along the ropes.
The sum of the tensions is directed upwards and has magnitude F=mg (m=mass of the beam).
 
Well, the weight causes a force of roughly 10*1000 = 10000 [N] on both ropes combined. But because of different angles, the forces caused by the ropes will not be the same. Let F1 be the force of the left rope (20 degree angle), and F2 the other force.

You know that the forces will have to keep the weight up, so the vertical components together must add up to 10000 [N] :

F1 sin[20] + F2 sin[30] = 10000

Now the horizontal components will be directed in opposite direction, and will, because of that, have to be of equal size. So:

F1 cos[20] - F2 cos[30] = 0

You can solve F1 and F2 from these equations, and check if any of the ropes will break.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top