Suspending a Weight with 3 Cords: A Puzzle

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisselt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Puzzle Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a weight suspended by three cords at different angles. The participant is unsure how to approach the problem, particularly with one cord positioned below horizontal. They propose that the vertical cord (T1) should balance the forces from the other two cords (T2 and T3) in both the x and y directions. The solution requires summing the forces at the junction point to achieve equilibrium, ensuring that both horizontal and vertical forces equal zero. A visual representation of the setup would greatly aid in understanding the problem.
fisselt
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Weight suspended by 3 cords. 1 from the weight goes up vertically to the knot. The next goes left 30° below horizontal and the last goes to the right 45° above horizontal.

Homework Equations


f=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't think I've ever worked a problem with a cord below horizontal. So I'm stumbling a bit.

Since there's only 1 cord above horizontal (T1) it should carry the whole y force. So, in y T1=T2+T3
And, in x the left and right cords must be equal T1=T2


T1sin(45)=T2sin(30)+mg

Not sure about the rest. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement is somewhat confusing. A figure would really help.
 
Quick picture I just made.
 

Attachments

  • Tension.jpg
    Tension.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 486
As the object not going up or down
it's too not going left or right, equal forces must be there to make it in equilibrium.
 
You simply need to sum forces, both horizontal and vertical, at the junction point, and require that both sum to zero. That will give you everything you need.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top