Symmetries and Maxwells equations

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's Equations for time-invariant systems can be separated into spatial and temporal components, particularly in radially invariant systems, where solutions can be expressed as products of radial and angular functions. The discussion raises the question of whether symmetry in systems governed by Maxwell's Equations leads to separable solutions, but it is clarified that this is only applicable to specific potentials like 1/r and r². The spatial dependence in Maxwell's Equations is linked to the permittivity ε(r) being a function of the refractive index n(r). A reference for further understanding is found in Volume 1 of Landau's Mechanics, which discusses the hidden SO(4) symmetry related to the 1/r potential. Overall, the discussion highlights the intricate relationship between symmetry and separability in the context of electromagnetic theory.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

Maxwells Equations for a time-invariant system are separable, hence we can write a solution as E(r, t) = E(r)E(t). They also mention that if the system is radially invariant, then that implies that the solution splits into a product of radial and angular functions (with 2π periodic angular functions).

Is it a general rule that when the system described by Maxwells equations has a symmetry, then the solutions become separable? If yes, does this go beyond Maxwells Equations?


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. It's only true for 1/r and r2 potentials.
 
Thanks. Where does that spatial dependence come into play when looking at Maxwells Equations? Is in through ε(r)=n(r)2?

Do you have a suggestion for a reference that explains this in more details?


Niles.
 
It's described in Volume 1 of Landau's Mechanics. Mathematically, it's because there is a hidden SO(4) symmetry in the equations describing the 1/r potential, and this symmetry (the same one that gives the n-l degeneracy in the hydrogen atom) ensures that the angular piece is separated out.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top