Is the Cubic Function Inversely Symmetric about its Point of Inflection?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores whether cubic functions are inversely symmetric about their point of inflection, similar to how quadratic functions exhibit symmetry about their stationary point. It establishes that the inflection point of a cubic function can be found using the second derivative, leading to the equation x = -b/(3a). The key argument is that to prove symmetry about the inflection point, one must evaluate the function at shifted points and check if f(x - b/(3a)) equals -f(-x - b/(3a)). This approach demonstrates that cubic functions are indeed symmetric about their inflection point, expanding understanding of their properties. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical proof and encourages further exploration of the concept.
Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
As we know, a quadratic function can be expressed in a form of complete square by a method of completing the square. This form enables us to prove that a quadratic equation is symmetric about its stationary point.
But for the cubic function, is there a similar way to prove that the cubic curve is inversely symmetric about its point of inflection?? (meaning to prove that the curve on each side of the inflection point is inverted but perfectly matched )


Thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Actually, it turns out that it does! I didn't know this before today.

Since you mentioned the inflexion point, I'm guessing you know calculus. So the proof goes a little something like this:

f(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d

f'(x)=3ax^2+2bx+c

f''(x)=6ax+2b

Now obviously to find where the inflexion point is, we let the second derivative equal to 0, so we get

6ax+2b=0

x=\frac{-b}{3a}

Now, the most important point in this proof is the part that comes next. We know that functions are odd or even based on some simple properties f(-x)=-f(x) and f(x)=f(-x) respectively, but this only applies to functions that are odd or even about the y-axis.

What we're trying to prove is if all cubics are odd about their inflexion point (most of the time their inflexion point is not on the y-axis, so whenever b\neq 0).

Before we try to figure out what we're supposed to be evaluating, let's take a simpler example:

g(x)=x^2-2x+1=(x-1)^2
How can we prove that g(x) is an even function about its turning point? Well, if we evaluated g(x+1), we will get g(x+1)=x^2 which is an even function as we know, but how do we show that?

That is, we can't just slap the even property of f(x)=f(-x) onto g, because then we'd be trying to solve g(x+1)=g(-(x+1)) and g(-x-1) is not equal to g(x+1). So what is? Well, if it turns out that we need to solve g(x+1)=g(-x+1).
You should try figure out why this is for yourself.

Ok, so applying what we've discovered to the cubic, it turns out that we want to see if

f\left(x-\frac{b}{3a}\right)=-f\left(-x-\frac{b}{3a}\right)

which if true, satisfies the proof that all cubics are symmetric about their inflexion point.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much. U r inspiring .
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
12
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
575