Synchronized random bit generator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating two devices that can generate the same random bits indefinitely, regardless of their distance apart. The concept is compared to sharing entangled particles but emphasizes that continuous exchange is not required. It is argued that such devices would essentially be pseudorandom number generators, as any separation beyond causal connection would render them functionally independent. Consequently, if operated at different times, the output would not be truly random. The conclusion drawn is that true synchronization of random bit generation over arbitrary distances is not achievable.
Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Is it possible to construct 2 devices which simultaneously generate (the same) random bits indefinitely? No matter how far apart spatially they are. And I don't mean a pseudorandom number generator with the same seed. I mean something like sharing entangled particles, but without the need to exchange stuff continuously.

It wouldn't violate FTL, so what's keeping us from doing it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, by definition, any such devices would be pseudorandom number generators. If the two devices were separated by enough space to no longer be causally connected, for example, then they might as well be operated at different times, too. If they're operated at different times, yet produce the same sequence of numbers, then by definition those numbers are not random.

- Warren
 
That's true. Good point.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Are entanglement correlations truly random?
2
Replies
92
Views
10K
I Big Bell Test Collaboration: Challenging Local Realism with Human Choices
Replies
6
Views
3K
I A popular explanation of Bell's inequalities
Replies
16
Views
3K
A Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
I Synchronizing clocks at different locations to measure speed of light
Replies
43
Views
3K
I Non-locality by memory (Jung, 2020) applied to stochastic mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Two Confusing Entanglement Scenarios
Replies
9
Views
1K
Writing: Input Wanted Building a Generation Ship: The SFV Exodus
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
A Astronomical Implications of Quantum Entanglement?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
Replies
25
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top