Syphoning Effect: Is It Possible?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter antekatavic
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of siphoning, particularly in relation to a closed reservoir containing water and a vacuum. Participants explore whether siphoning can occur under specific conditions, such as when the output is higher than the input, and the implications of pressure and gravity in these scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that siphoning cannot occur if the output is higher than the input, emphasizing the role of gravity in siphoning.
  • Others propose that a vacuum created by falling water is necessary for siphoning, questioning how this applies in a closed system with a vacuum present.
  • A participant suggests that if a siphon is created and the container is made airtight, the siphon would not function due to pressure equalization.
  • There are claims that the size of the siphon may be limited, with a specific mention of a 33-foot limit for water due to atmospheric pressure constraints.
  • One participant raises a hypothetical scenario involving a bottle turned upside down and questions whether this would create a vacuum, leading to further discussion about pressure and air replacement.
  • Another participant introduces a concept of using siphoning in a geothermal context, but this is met with confusion and disagreement regarding the definition of siphoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of siphoning under certain conditions, particularly regarding the height of the output relative to the input and the necessity of air pressure. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

Several assumptions about pressure, gravity, and the physical properties of fluids are discussed, but no consensus is reached on the implications of these factors in the context of siphoning.

  • #61


Ok. first You are telling me to run numbers now not to... I do not know anymore...
does anything I wrote has any practical use anywhere on the planet or it is all nonsens
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62


@ jared look what jschmidt wrote at th second page
 
  • #63


antekatavic said:
Ok. first You are telling me to run numbers now not to... I do not know anymore...
does anything I wrote has any practical use anywhere on the planet or it is all nonsens

The concept is mostly fine, its just the details that could use some work.
 
  • #64


The lowest exposed land on Earth is at the Dead Sea shore, at -413 meters. How about runing a pipe from mediteran sea to a dead sea... the bigest siphon ever!
you could run a turbines with the fall of wather of 423meters !
 
Last edited:
  • #65


also you have much others depresion and they are almost all located near the sea, and where the tectonic plates colide
 
  • #66


Again, you have to take into account resistive losses. The pipe itself will have a loss per meter and then every twist and turn will have one.

Particularly when considering long distances, you must factor them in.

You also need to consider the flow rate and how much power generation it would allow for.
 
  • #67


I think the bigest problem would be that the pipe would had to be on big elevation from ground due to a fact that is a depresion! and that pipe fileed with water would be wery heavy... so you would have to put the pipe so it is folowing the ground and still you would have a big flow and presure because 420 meters is big elevation on a 300 km long pipe

edit but in this case it is not a siphon:(((((
edit: or maybe it can be if at the and of the pipe I have a vertical fall biger then 10 meters :)))
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
723
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K