System Loss In Terms of I why not V?

AI Thread Summary
System loss in transmission lines is primarily calculated using the formula i^2R, which highlights the importance of reducing current to minimize losses. However, an alternative calculation using v^2/R suggests that reducing voltage could also be beneficial. The discussion emphasizes that at radio frequencies, energy loss occurs mainly due to resistance, and the relationship between voltage and current is defined by the line's characteristic impedance. Power attenuation is the critical factor, particularly in the presence of reflected energy. Losses are typically expressed in logarithmic ratios, measured in dB per unit length, to effectively communicate the impact of these losses.
eee_engin33r
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We all know that the system loss in transmission line is i^2R. So, in order to reduce the loss we diminish the current flow through the line by means of transformer.
My question is i can also calculate system loss by the formula v^2/R where v is the potential across transmission line. So, shouldn't we reduce the voltage instead of current in that sense?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
in this case it would be the V DROP along the T line... not the applied voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes pocho and eee_engin33r
At radio frequencies, as a signal travels along a transmission line energy is lost, mostly by I2R to the resistance of the line. But the ratio of voltage to current on the line is determined by the characteristic impedance of the line. So, stricktly speaking, it is power that is attenuated along a line of fixed characteristic impedance, unless there is reflected energy.

That is why losses are specified using logarithmic ratios, in dB per set length.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top