T-symmetry (string theory) for minimum length?

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,750
Reaction score
243
If I understand Brian Greene’s argument (in The Elegant Universe, and repeated elsewhere) for the Planck length being the minimum measurable length based on T-symmetry in string theory, it goes something like this:
There are two ways to measure things, one with vibrational energy v and one with winding energy w. Measurements with v gives one set of results; measuring with w gives another. The two sets of results can be seen to be isomorphic by the identification of the lengths with their reciprocals. The two give the same results at the Planck distance. Therefore (?) when a length is measured with probes, above the Planck distance the probe measures with v, and below that distance, the probe measures with w. Hence one never obtains a measurement less than the Planck distance.
If this is a fair summary, could someone clear up that inference marked with a question mark? If it is an incorrect summary, what have I missed?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, Demystifier. Downloaded.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
305
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top