Tadpole graph & normal ordering

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumDevil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Normal
QuantumDevil
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
It is said that so called tadpole graph gets eliminated from perturbation expansion if the normal-ordered interaction is adopted. How can it be proved? Can anybody provide some links or any other references about this problems?

L_{int}=-e:\bar{\psi}\gamma_{\mu}\psi A^{\mu}:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is attachement with this graph
 

Attachments

  • tadpole.jpg
    tadpole.jpg
    3.3 KB · Views: 705
...and this also should remove the mass shift I suppose.
 
See Peskin and Schroder, Chapter 4.

You can see right away that (at least in QED) tadpoles for the photon must vanish, since QED has a charge-conjugation symmetry in which the photon field is odd, so the one-point function for the photon must vanish. You can also see that the diagram you included vanishes since the loop integral explicitly vanishes:

\int d^4k\frac{{\rm Tr}[\gamma^\mu(k\!\!\!\slash+m)]}{k^2-m^2}= \int d^4k\frac{4k^\mu+0}{k^2-m^2}=0

These two statements are, of course, related.
 
How do you know that it is zero by direct computation?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top