Take Intro to Topology or Intro to Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between Intro to Topology and Intro to Analysis is a common dilemma for mathematics majors, especially when considering graduate school prerequisites. Analysis is often viewed as more applicable and is a core requirement for many programs, making it a safer choice for those planning to pursue further studies. However, the difficulty level of the topology course and its prerequisites should be considered, as topology may require a solid foundation in analysis. Some students find topology more engaging despite its challenges, while others prefer the structured approach of analysis. Ultimately, if only one course can be taken, analysis is generally recommended for its relevance and foundational importance.
andyroo
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I'm about to take my higher upper division classes to complete my mathematics major. I've decided that I'd like to take either Intro to Topology or Intro to Analysis as my topics of choice, along with the required Linear Algebra course that most graduate schools are looking for in applicants. I know what each type of study is about and that it's likely that they'd both interest me, however, I'm not sure which one I would truly enjoy the most.

As far as classes go, I enjoyed vector calculus but not so much multi-variable calculus, I enjoyed elementary analysis to an extent (meaning I can only take so much analysis homework before I become bored), and lastly, elementary differential equations was a favorite class of mine as well. I have yet to take elementary linear algebra, but will this summer before my fall term. Going off this information is there anyway someone could give me an idea about which sequence I should take out of either Intro to Topology or Intro to Analysis? Thanks for your advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would take intro to analysis I think its more interesting, and probably has more application areas.
 
As a general answer, I would agree with "into to analysis".

But I suppose if you were totally committed to specialising in algebra or geometry, and were only interested in algebraic topology and not analytic, then you could argue the other way.
 
Thanks for the thoughts! I'll probably register for analysis then
 
Why not both?
 
Analysis is usually a minimum core class for just about any grad program (linear algebra and abstract algebra being the other two core sequences). So if you can take only one, and you are considering grad school, Analysis is it.

The other thing to consider/ask is: how "Intro" is this Topology class? Topology draws a lot of ideas from analysis, and usually (but not always), at least one course of Analysis is a pre-req to an Intro to Topology course. Also, Topology at my school is noooooo joke, much more difficult than an Intro to Analysis course, and would be even harder without the Analysis experience.

You also said this will be your first higher lever math class? By that do you mean your first real "Proof" based class? Again, depending on the level they are teaching the topology and analysis, you may want to consider taking Analysis as a first real rigorous math course (actually, junior/senior level Linear Algebra is probably the kindest "first" course in rigorous, proof based math, but Analysis would probably be the next after).

Having said all that, personally I find Analysis to be EXTREMELY BORING. Though Topology is very similar in style, for whatever reason I find it much more interesting and fun. Definitely harder, definitely consuming more of my time, but just more enjoyable. So my opinion is that if you just need a class to fill up your schedule and your school does not require Analysis as pre-req to Topology and either Grad School isn't your future or you have time to take Analysis some other time, maybe consider taking Topology first...only because I think it would be more interesting and should prepare you for Analysis in the future.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top