Programs Taken an intro level class, should I change my major?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the consideration of changing a major to Physics after enjoying introductory, non-calculus-based courses. The individual expresses concerns about their math foundation, having previously struggled with Geometry, Trigonometry, and Calculus, and questions whether a passion for the subject is sufficient for a major switch. Key points include the importance of a strong math background for upper-level Physics courses, which typically require calculus-based prerequisites. Participants suggest that while it is possible to succeed with self-study and dedication, the transition may be challenging without solid math skills. Recommendations include reviewing calculus-based Physics materials and consulting academic advisors about potential pathways, such as self-study options or bridge courses. Overall, the consensus is that while the journey may be difficult, it is feasible with commitment to improving math skills.
frontsteps
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
So far, I have taken two, non-calc based intro level Physics classes (101 and 102). I really enjoyed the material covered in both classes. For once, I actually enjoyed working through problem sets and I found myself researching topics outside of the classroom. I am seriously considering changing my major over to Physics.

However, I am a little worried about changing over, simply because I do not have the strongest foundation in math. I have taken Geometry, Trig, and Calc, but I found that I had to reteach myself many of the things I learned in Trig and Geometry for Physics 101/102. I know that understanding calc (and math in general) is extremely important for upper level physics classes.

I was just wondering if you guys think that changing my major to Physics simply because I really enjoyed two intro level courses is actually a logical decision. The two non-calc based intro classes I took probably don't represent upper level Physics classes all that well, do they? Not sure if this is even answerable - but how different is calc based general physics from non-calc based physics? Can I actually do well in the upper level courses (optics, thermal, etc...) with weak(ish) math skills? If it helps, I am willing to learn what I need to in math in order to strengthen those skills. But is it worth it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just took a look at the "So You Want to be a Physicist" thread on this forum. It was extremely useful! Clearly, having a strong foundation in math is a must. But can I reteach myself what I need to know as I take upper level classes? Or would that just lead to me falling behind?
 
frontsteps said:
I just took a look at the "So You Want to be a Physicist" thread on this forum. It was extremely useful! Clearly, having a strong foundation in math is a must. But can I reteach myself what I need to know as I take upper level classes? Or would that just lead to me falling behind?

You can definitely still do it for sure. But you might feel like you are swimming just behind.

I switched over from bio myself.

I took phys 1&2 as calc-based but just at a local very low level college over the summer and it wasn't a particularly challenging class and I breezed through to 4.0s without even trying really, but that meant that I started without having had the basics drummed into me at a high level well and without having done tons of problems (my thought process had been: I was going to major in bio but since I also had some interest in physics and wanted to be able to take more than a couple physics electives along the way, I could just get 1-2 out of the way over the summer on the cheap locally so I could hit up more physics electives on the side of my bio major and since I wasn't going to major in physics or take physics GRE or whatnot it really didn't matter a whole lot). Once I switched to physics, that wasn't quite the ideal place to have started from. Also the physics GRE happens to be considerably based on a strong phys 1-2 foundation.

What I could suggest (and that I did absolutely none of myself, don't do as I did) is to spend the rest of the summer trying to go over as many Phys 1&2 problems and much material as you can from a calc based book like University Physics (or even better K&K and Morin). There isn't much left to the summer so you might not get too far now but do what you can and then next summer go over all of the rest of that basic stuff well. Knowing that stuff inside out and being able to snap snap snap the problems will help everything else and especially the physics GRE test. Do a lot of problems.
 
calc 1-3, linear algebra, diff eq. are some of really core math classes
 
At most schools, the upper-level physics courses require the calculus-based intro courses as prerequisites. You may be able to substitute the algebra/trig based courses, or you may need to take some kind of "bridge" course, or you may be able to self-study and then take some kind of exam, or you may have to take the full calc-based intro courses. Study the physics major requirements on your college's website carefully, and talk to an advisor in the physics department about it. Different schools do things differently.
 
jtbell said:
At most schools, the upper-level physics courses require the calculus-based intro courses as prerequisites. You may be able to substitute the algebra/trig based courses, or you may need to take some kind of "bridge" course, or you may be able to self-study and then take some kind of exam, or you may have to take the full calc-based intro courses. Study the physics major requirements on your college's website carefully, and talk to an advisor in the physics department about it. Different schools do things differently.

I spoke to a Physics advisor and she said that I can self-study to catch up on the material that I missed out on by taking the non-calculus based course. But I'm guessing this is an "easier said than done" type situation.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top