Courses Taking continuous probability over discrete probability?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision to take an upper-level probability course (MATH 471) without completing the elementary course (MATH 371) first. While MATH 471 covers many concepts from MATH 371, it is suggested that taking both courses provides a more comprehensive understanding, especially in areas like combinatorial probability and important distributions. Participants emphasize the value of foundational knowledge in statistics and probability for fields such as physics and engineering. Consulting with instructors or the math department chair is recommended to make an informed decision. Ultimately, the individual decided to take MATH 371 first, expressing concern about retaining knowledge from Calculus IV.
Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91
I'm considering taking the upper-level probability course at my school over the elementary course offered because of time constraints. The latter is not a prerequisite for the former. Do you think I will be alright taking the more advanced probability course over the elementary course? Any input offered will be much appreciated. Thank you.

MATH 371 Elementary Probability Theory (3) Sets, discrete sample spaces, problems in combinatorial probability, random variables, mathematical expectations, classical distributions, applications. Pre: [Calculus II]

MATH 471 Probability (3) Probability spaces, random variables, distributions, expectations, moment-generating and characteristic functions, limit theorems. Continuous probability emphasized. Pre: [Calculus IV]

Here are the courses. I've already taken Calculus IV, so I can just skip to 471.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most of the concepts in MATH 371 are baked into MATH 471 because continuous probability theory is built up in a similar way to discrete prob theory. However, if you just took 471, some of the stuff you'd miss out on learning include important probability distributions and combinatorics, which is by the way very important in statistical physics, computer science etc.

That said, I'd put priority on taking both 371 and 471. If you want to do 471, you'll have to learn most of what's in 371 anyway, so might as well do it properly and take both courses. Also, understanding statistics and probability theory is extremely useful for physicists/engineers.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
My suggestion would be to speak to the instructors for both courses if possible (or the chair of the math department) and get their assessment of which sequence of probability courses are worth taking before taking any action.

That being said, from the limited description above, it does seem like MATH 471 would include most of the concepts taught in MATH 371. So you might be OK with taking just MATH 471, but taking both may be a better idea.
 
Hey Eclair_de_XII

For undergraduate courses, most of the concepts are redundant between the two categories of distributions.

For graduate coursework, you learn how to deal with both when you look at measure theory and probability.

You should know this if you want to choose one course over another - and the main difference for undergraduate courses is that you will see Sigma's instead of integrals and different probability transform/generation functions for the discrete and continuous cases.
 
Thank you, everyone. I ended up deciding to take 371 and its supplementary course first, and then 471 and that supplementary course one year later. I'm kind of worried that I might forget my Calculus IV by then...
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top