Taking the lim operation on both sides

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
is it legal to take the limit on both sides of an expression

i particular

when i have

sup x_n <=sup y_n

is it ok to do

limsup x_n <=limsup y_n

is the limit of the supremums group of subsequences is the limsup on the sequence
??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the properties of the limit is that if a_n\le b_n for all n, then \lim_{n\to\infty}a_n\le\lim_{n\to\infty}b_n provided that these limits exist.
Does this answer your question?
 
This isn't quite that case yyat.

Counterexample: xn = 1 if n=1, 0 otherwise
yn = 1/2 for all n

supxn = 1
supyn = 1/2

limsup xn = 0
limsup yn = 1/2
 
Office_Shredder said:
This isn't quite that case yyat.

Counterexample: xn = 1 if n=1, 0 otherwise
yn = 1/2 for all n

supxn = 1
supyn = 1/2

limsup xn = 0
limsup yn = 1/2

I don't see how this contradicts anything I wrote.

But you are right, if transgalactic means that sup x_n=sup{x_n,n>=0}, then the statement is wrong by the counterexample you gave (with x_n, y_n switched). I assumed it meant sup{x_n,n>m}<=sup{y_n,n>m} for all m.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top