Tangential Acceleration and Gravity in a moving car

AI Thread Summary
A car traveling at a constant speed of 10.0 m/s over a circular arch with a radius of 50.0 m exerts an upward force on a 64.0 kg passenger. The centripetal acceleration, directed towards the center of the arch, is caused by the weight of the passenger, which also acts downward. The correct calculation for the upward force considers that the gravitational force provides the necessary centripetal acceleration, leading to an answer of 499.84 N. The confusion arises from the direction of forces; while both gravitational weight and centripetal acceleration point downwards, they are treated differently in calculations. Understanding that centripetal force is provided by weight helps clarify the relationship between these forces.
Conservation
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car is driven at a constant speed of 10.0 m/s as it travels over a circular-shaped arch. If the radius of curvature of the bridge is 50.0m, what upward force does the car exert on the 64.0 kg person riding in the car as it passes over the bridge?

Homework Equations


v2/r=ac
Fman on car=Fcar on man
Fg=mag

The Attempt at a Solution


The centripetal acceleration is towards the center, or down towards the bottom of the arched bridge. Similarly, the man's weight is exerted downwards. Both of these forces contribute to the Fman on car.

Hence, Fman on car=mag+mv2/r, making the answer 755.84 N. However, the answer key says that the mag and the mv2/r are in different directions, making the answer 499.84 N instead. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They are in fact in different directions, so I don't know what the solution means. But for the answer make a free-body diagram.

∑F_{y} = F - mg = -ma

So F in fact equals mg - ma

The error in your reasoning is that the quantity mv^2/r, the centripetal acceleration, is not provided by a separate force -- the weight force provides it, so the relationship changes. Also, it's not tangential acceleration, but instead centripetal acceleration, because it points inward.
 
Wow, my apologies. I meant to say centripetal-I have no idea why I said tangential.

I don't understand what you mean by the fact that the weight force "provides the centripetal acceleration." Could you elaborate on the topic?

Also, why are they different directions? Aren't both gravitational weight and centripetal acceleration towards the center, or below the bridge?

Thank you.
 
No problem -- I do it all the time.

Think about it in terms of Newton's second: F = ma

Essentially this means that forces provide accelerations, and accelerations need forces to produce them. So the centripetal acceleration needs a force to produce it, and this is the weight force. Centripetal forces are what provide centripetal accelerations, so in this case weight force also acts as the centripetal force. Mathematically, the quantities go on separate sides of the equation, which is how you get that negative sign in the answer. That's why even though they're in the same direction, their magnitudes don't add -- they're different quantities.

EDIT: Sorry, I meant in my first post to say that weight force and acceleration are in the same direction -- just mathematically they end up opposite one another.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top