Tangential, Radial Components of Acceleration Quick Question

AI Thread Summary
In discussing the tangential and radial components of acceleration, it is clarified that these components do indeed have directions. Radial acceleration points towards the center of the circle, while tangential acceleration is directed along the tangent. The values can be assigned positive or negative based on the defined unit vector, such as \hat{r} pointing outward. It is emphasized that clarity in showing work is essential, and the vector sign should be consistently applied or omitted. Ultimately, the focus should be on correctly representing the components without confusion over vector notation.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Are you supposed to write directions for the tangential and radial components of acceleration?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Because they are components, I'd say no... isn't a component usually written without a vector sign, and therefore no direction?

The thing is, components DO have direction. Radial acceleration is towards the center of the circle, while tangential is tangent to the circle. Couldn't these values also be positive or negative? If I define a unit vector \hat{r} that points OUTWARDS from the center of circle, wouldn't my radial acceleration be negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tangential and radial components of an acceleration must have a direction assigned to them, just as components of forces for example must have a direction. Often the direction is indicated as plus or minus, or in or out, or up or down, etc.
 
Who cares? As long as you show your work clearly, it doesn't matter. Just make sure you don't include a vector sign on the acceleration if you don't include a vector sign on its value (e.g. don't write a-arrow=v^2/r; write either a=v^2/r or a-arrow=v^2/r r-hat).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top