Taub-Nut or NUT metric, that is the question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saeide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
Saeide
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

We know that NUT spacetime is just like a massless rotating black hole, that this consideration introduces a new concept "magnetic mass", and I know just a little about its metric form and the parameters appear in it. While I was searching for NUT spacetime and its metric, I mostly found some papers about Taub-NUT spacetime. Are these two spacetimes different or the same? And if they are different what are the differences and similarities? And another question is that what is the differences between pure-NUT and NUT spacetime? And also I would like to know more about NUT parameter that we see in the metric and its behavior! I would appreciate if someone answer my questions or guide me to the texts related to this subject.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
NUT and Taub-NUT are one and the same. Taub found the solution first as a cosmological solution. The NUT solution was later shown to be the same. NUT may be thought of as a Schwarzschild solution with a complex mass parameter m + iℓ where ℓ is the NUT parameter. There is also a Kerr-NUT solution which adds the Kerr parameter a. All of these are Type D vacuum solutions.
 
So thanks, that was so helpful. I wonder how I didn't get it so far!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top