Taylor Expansion: Do Assumptions Apply?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Taylor expansion of the function f(ω + m sin(Ωt)), where ω and Ω are frequencies, m is a constant, and t represents time. The original poster questions whether assumptions about the sizes of m and Ω are necessary for the expansion to be valid.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of truncating the Taylor expansion and the accuracy of the approximation based on the size of the added quantity and the behavior of the second derivative of f. There is also a discussion about the terminology used in describing the expansion point.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the nature of the expansion and its dependence on the terms involved. There is an acknowledgment of the terminology used in the context of Taylor expansions, but no explicit consensus has been reached on the assumptions required.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of truncating the series and the potential need for assumptions about the magnitudes of m and Ω, as well as the behavior of the function being expanded.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

Say I want to Taylor-expand
[tex] f(\omega + m\sin(\Omega t))[/tex]
where ω and Ω are frequencies, m is some constant and t denotes time. Then I would get
[tex] f(\omega + m\sin(\Omega t)) = f(\omega) + (m\sin(\Omega t)\frac{dI}{d\omega} + \ldots[/tex]
Is it necessary to make any assumptions on the sizes of m and Ω in order to make the above expansion?


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are Taylor expanding in the quantity you are adding to ω and I means f(ω) that's fine. If you are going to truncate the expansion there and wondering if it's a accurate expansion that's going to depend on the size of the quantity you are adding to ω and the behaviour of f''(ω). You'll want to look at Taylor series remainder terms if you are concerned about how good it is.
 
Thanks!Niles.
 
Niles said:
Actually, isn't this an expansion around the point ω rather than msin(Ωt) if we use the definition here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series#Definition?

Sure it is. It's 'around' ω. I say the expansion is 'in' msin(Ωt) because that's the thing that appears in all the powers. Just terminology.
 
Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying.Niles.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K