Taylor mechanics ch3 problem7 -- Men jumping off of a railcar

  • Thread starter Thread starter kylinsky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Taylor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two men jumping off a stationary railroad flatcar and determining the car's speed after they jump. The initial attempt at a solution involved using conservation of momentum, resulting in a speed formula. However, the user encountered a discrepancy between their answer and one found online. Participants emphasized the importance of sharing complete work and solutions directly in the thread for effective assistance. The consensus is that the user's approach appears correct, but further clarification or details from the alternative solution are needed for a thorough comparison.
kylinsky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


two man,each of equal mass m,are standing at one end of a stationary railroad flatcar with frictionless wheel and mass mcar.Find the car's speed if the two men run to the other end of the car and jump off simultaneously with the same speed u(relative to the car)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


let vh be the men's speed relative to the ground at the instant they jump off the car.Thus
u= vh+vcar.Since the momentum of the system is conservative,2mvh=mcarvcar

After solving the equations,i got (2mu)/(2m+mcar) ,but i found a different answer from mine on the websitehttp://chriskranenberg.wix.com/taylor-mechanics-solutions.I want to make sure which one is right
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you type out the website solution instead of forcing helpers to go searching for a pdf offsite? It can only be a few characters long. You're asking for help, so make it easier for the helpers to do so.

You posted an identical question by a slightly different name on October 8th:

taylor mechanics chap3,problem 4

and you never followed up the help response (although you did fix the notation/formatting in your post). I'll give the same advice this time: Show your work so that we can help you with that. We won't just select the right answer for you.
 
gneill said:
Why don't you type out the website solution instead of forcing helpers to go searching for a pdf offsite? It can only be a few characters long. You're asking for help, so make it easier for the helpers to do so.

You posted an identical question by a slightly different name on October 8th:

taylor mechanics chap3,problem 4

and you never followed up the help response (although you did fix the notation/formatting in your post). I'll give the same advice this time: Show your work so that we can help you with that. We won't just select the right answer for you.
i did follow the help response and add the derivation to my solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kylinsky said:
i did follow the help response and add the derivation to my solution.
Editing your original post to add new material does not ALERT those following the thread. If you want people who are following or contributing to your thread to see new material, add it in a new post. That will send an ALERT to draw their attention to your thread. Otherwise there's no assurance that your material will ever be noticed by others.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
So getting back to the problem at hand, your work as far as it is described is correct, and I agree with your solution.

I won't comment on work I can't see, and I don't feel the urge to download a pdf from some site to go hunting for this alternate solution somewhere inside it. If you wish to discuss this alternate solution, please present it here in detail, or at least post an excerpted image of the specific content.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top