Temperature change in an object

AI Thread Summary
A lead bullet with a mass of 0.03 kg traveling at 198 m/s strikes an armor plate, converting its kinetic energy into heat, resulting in a temperature change of 150.78°C. The kinetic energy (KE) is calculated using the formula KE = 1/2 mv², yielding a value of 588.06 J. The heat capacity of lead is 130 J/kg-°C, which is used to determine the temperature change by rearranging the equation Q = CmΔT. Dimensional analysis confirms that the units of energy (Joules) relate to mass and velocity squared, clarifying the transition from kg·m²/s² to J/kg. Proper presentation of work is emphasized for effective problem-solving in physics discussions.
kieslingrc
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1. A lead bullet with a mass of 0.03 kg traveling at 198 m/s strikes an armor plate and comes to a stop. If all the energy is converted to heat and absorbed by the bullet, what is the temperature change?



2. Q=KE=1/2mv^2; Q=CmΔT



3. Heat capacity (C) of lead = 130J/kg-°C, mass of the bullet = .03kg, velocity of the bullet = 198m/s

I first wanted to calculate the KE of the bullet (.5)(.03kg)(198m/s)^2 and obtained 588.06 kg m/s/s but the closest example to this problem in my book does not follow that equation. It instead would calculate it as follows:
Q = KE = 1/2mv^2: 1/2*m*(198m/s)^2; = (19602J/kg) * m [How does it become a J/kg?]
Then the increase in temperature caused by this much heat is:
Q = 19602J/kg * m = CmΔT (the masses will cancel out here)
Q = 19602J/kg = 130J/kg-°C * ΔT
Q = 19602J/kg / 130J/kg-°C = ΔT
ΔT = 150.78°C

I have a couple of questions about this equation (even if correct)
Why/how did the m/s/s part of the equation change to J/kg?
Why does the example in the book leave the mass out of the equation when solving for the heat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi

this question is from thermal physics. in the physics education, you are taught dimensional analysis at the very beginning. so by the time you are solving problems from thermal physics, you should be very clear on dimensional analysis.

when you do (.5)(.03kg)(198m/s)^2 , the units you get is kg.\frac{m^2}{s^2}
and not kg.\frac{m}{s^2} as you have done. And kg.\frac{m^2}{s^2}
is the unit of energy (here, kinetic form). In the honor of english physicist Thomas Joule, who made imporatant contributions to the thermal physics, this unit is called Joule. So

1\mbox{ Joule }=1 \; kg.\frac{m^2}{s^2}

So if the Q is energy, the unit of Q is J. We can write Q as Q=\frac{Q}{m}.\;m . Now the units of \frac{Q}{m}
would be J/kg . So we can write Q as product of some number (whose unit is J/kg) and m (the mass, with unit kg).

The reason the example leaves the mass separate like this is , as you can see, it cancels out . So it just saves the number of
numerical computations you have to do...
 
Last edited:
IssacNewton said:
hi

this question is from thermal physics. in the physics education, you are taught dimensional analysis at the very beginning. so by the time you are solving problems from thermal physics, you should be very clear on dimensional analysis.

when you do (.5)(.03kg)(198m/s)^2 , the units you get is kg.\frac{m^2}{s^2}
and not kg.\frac{m}{s^2} as you have done. And kg.\frac{m^2}{s^2}
is the unit of energy (here, kinetic form). In the honor of english physicist Thomas Joule, who made imporatant contributions to the thermal physics, this unit is called Joule. So

1\mbox{ Joule }=1 \; kg.\frac{m^2}{s^2}

So if the Q is energy, the unit of Q is J. We can write Q as Q=\frac{Q}{m}.\;m . Now the units of \frac{Q}{m}
would be J/kg . So we can write Q as product of some number (whose unit is J/kg) and m (the mass, with unit kg).

The reason the example leaves the mass separate like this is , as you can see, it cancels out . So it just saves the number of
numerical computations you have to do...

Thanks for the reply and for pointing out my error on the units. I knew there was something in common with the J and kg m2/s2, I just couldn't find it in my notes.

Otherwise, I believe the math to be correct? Thanks for the speedy reply. I really love math, but it's so hard to pick up again when you haven't done it in over 20 years.
 
good luck with your education. remember to always present your work. if you ask a question and don't present your work, people will tend to not answer it since this is not a
tutoring website.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top