What Determines the Shift from Compression to Tension in a Swinging Rod System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the critical angle at which the force in a swinging rod system transitions from compression to tension. Using Newtonian physics, the critical angle is derived as θ_c = cos^(-1)(2cos(θ_0)/3), where θ_0 is the initial angle. Concerns are raised about whether the mass can maintain circular motion after passing this critical angle, given that the net force may point outward. However, it is clarified that the mass is constrained to circular motion, ensuring the net force always directs toward the center. The transition from compression to tension simply alters the rod's role in the net force.
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
I found a long-time ago problem in helping archive here

The problem is about attaching a mass m to a massless rod which released at initial angle \theta_0 (measured from vertically axis), try to find the critical angle where the compression force change to tension force. Using Newtonian physics, the radial direction

T-mg\cos\theta=-ml\frac{v^{2}}{l}

where T is the compression/tension of the rod, v is the velocity along tangential direction. At critical angle, the compression/tension force become zero, so

mg\cos\theta=ml\frac{v^{2}}{l}

Apply the conservation of energy, one can find the critical angle is

\theta_c = \cos^{-1}\left(\frac{2\cos\theta_0}{3}\right)

which is same as the solution in the old post.

But my question is, when the mass keep falling and the angle is larger than the critical angle, will the net force pointing outward so the acceleration is not pointing toward the center? If so, the object will not do a circular motion when it pass the critical angle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi KFC! :smile:
KFC said:
But my question is, when the mass keep falling and the angle is larger than the critical angle, will the net force pointing outward so the acceleration is not pointing toward the center? If so, the object will not do a circular motion when it pass the critical angle?

:confused: But …
The other end of the rod is attached to a frictionless pivot.

… so one end is fixed, and so the mass has to move in a circle, doesn't it?
 
KFC said:
But my question is, when the mass keep falling and the angle is larger than the critical angle, will the net force pointing outward so the acceleration is not pointing toward the center? If so, the object will not do a circular motion when it pass the critical angle?
Since, as tiny-tim points out, the mass is constrained to move in a circle, at all times the net force will point toward the center.

Passing the "critical point" just changes the rod's contribution to the net force from a push to a pull.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top