Tension in the string of a rotating, massive pulley

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the tension in a string attached to a block falling from a massive pulley. The participant successfully calculated the block's final velocity using conservation of energy principles. However, they expressed uncertainty about how to accurately determine the tension in the string and whether it remains constant during the fall. Other contributors clarified that the tension can be derived from the block's acceleration and the torque on the pulley, emphasizing that using the appropriate equations simplifies the process. The consensus is that the tension is indeed related to the torque, and a more straightforward approach exists for finding it.
raving_lunatic
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, everyone. Me again. This time I'm here to ask about the tension in the string on a massive pulley.

We have a wheel of radius R with a moment of inertia about its principal axis of 2/3 MR2 , suspended above the ground on frictionless bearings. A massless string of length L is wound about the wheel, one end of which is attached to a block of mass m, which falls a distance h to the ground (where h is less than L.) We're asked what speed the block reaches before it hits the ground, and what the tension in the string during the fall is.


Homework Equations



Conservation of energy:

1/2 I ω2 + 1/2 m v2 = mgh

Torque G = I \ddot{θ}

mg - T = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I got the first bit okay just by using conservation of energy - I said that the string wrapped around the pulley constrained the mass such that its speed was always equal to R \dot{θ} where θ is the angle that the pulley has turned through. We can then express the rotational kinetic energy and the KE of the block in terms of R \dot{θ} and solve for the final velocity:

mgh = 1/2 m (R \dot{θ})2 + 1/3 M (R \dot{θ})2

which gives V = \sqrt{6mgh/(3m+2M}


Now the tension in the string I was not so sure about, specifically how exactly it relates to the acceleration of the pulley. Is the tension multiplied by the pulley radius the torque that acts on the pulley during the fall? I'm also not sure whether the tension is constant (i.e. the block accelerates at a constant rate) - it seems like it should be this way as the rate of conversion of gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy has the same dependence as it would if the wheel wasn't there (just a different constant of proportionality) but again, I'm unsure.

If we can say that the tension is constant and that the torque on the wheel is just T * R, then I think I can solve it: final angular velocity is V/R, and so the final angular momentum is IV/R and this implies that TR * t = IV/R where t is the total time the block was falling for. We then also have (g - T/m) is the acceleration of the block, and we can use V / (g - T/m) = time taken to fall and consequently solve these two equations for the tension - I'm just not sure if my approach is at all correct in the physics. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raving_lunatic said:
Is the tension multiplied by the pulley radius the torque that acts on the pulley during the fall?

Correct.

Apart from this you need two more equations .

1) Write ∑F = ma for the block in vertical direction .
2) Write no slip condition for the pulley i.e the tangential acceleration of the pulley at the point where the string leaves it is equal to the acceleration of the block .

These three equations will give you the value of tension .
 
You got everything right except finding T is much simpler than you propose. Your approach might work also but since above you already wrote the equation out why not just use that. If T is constant then it should be independent of time.
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Apart from this you need two more equations .
Why? r_l had to find the final velocity, and that has been done. The tension can now be deduced by considering the acceleration of either the wheel or the mass.
Of the two, I would have thought the mass a little simpler, which may be what paisiello2 is hinting at.
Also, it is not necessary to consider time if the appropriate SUVAT equation is used. r_l, you need the one that relates acceleration, initial speed, final speed and distance. Or, completely equivalently, consider force, energy change and distance. It's the same as using the SUVAT equation, but multiplying everything by the mass.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K