Tensor equation in Dirac's 1975 book

In summary, the Dirac equation, which is represented by x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=g^{\lambda}_{\nu}, does not have a 4 on the right side. When expanded, the equation shows that the first term, for example, is 1 and all off-diagonal terms are 0. This is consistent with the special case of the identity transformation.
  • #1
241
10
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=(4?)g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
exmarine said:
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=(4?)g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]

Nope. let me open the expression for you


[itex]\Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu [/itex]
 
  • #3
Let me open it some more

[itex]
\Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\Sigma _ \mu \delta ^ \lambda _ \mu \delta ^ \mu _ \nu =\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu [/itex]
 
  • #4
? Wouldn't the first term, for example, be:

[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{0'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{0'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{1'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{1'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{2'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{2'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{3'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{3'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]=4?

And all the off-diagonals be 0 of course.
 
  • #5
Consider the special case of the identity transformation, where all the new coordinates are the same as the old ones. That is, x0' = x0, x1' = x1, x2' = x2, and x3' = x3. Plug this into your equation, and I think you'll see that the result is 1, not 4.
 

Suggested for: Tensor equation in Dirac's 1975 book

Replies
12
Views
576
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
319
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
770
Replies
6
Views
988
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top