Tensor equation in Dirac's 1975 book

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter exmarine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Tensor
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=(4?)g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exmarine said:
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x[itex]^{\lambda}_{,\mu}[/itex]x[itex]^{\mu}_{,\nu}[/itex]=(4?)g[itex]^{\lambda}_{\nu}[/itex]

Nope. let me open the expression for you


[itex]\Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu[/itex]
 
Let me open it some more

[itex] \Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\Sigma _ \mu \delta ^ \lambda _ \mu \delta ^ \mu _ \nu =\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu[/itex]
 
? Wouldn't the first term, for example, be:

[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{0'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{0'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{1'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{1'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{2'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{2'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{3'}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial x^{3'}}{\partial x^{0}}[/itex]=4?

And all the off-diagonals be 0 of course.
 
Consider the special case of the identity transformation, where all the new coordinates are the same as the old ones. That is, x0' = x0, x1' = x1, x2' = x2, and x3' = x3. Plug this into your equation, and I think you'll see that the result is 1, not 4.