Tensor & Matrix: Cartesian Vector & Transformation Rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Tensor
AI Thread Summary
Constant arrays such as (v_1, v_2, v_3) represent components of a Cartesian vector that adhere to the transformation rule through coordinate rotation. The discussion raises the question of whether constant arrays a_{ij} can be classified as components of a Cartesian tensor, specifically if they satisfy the tensor transformation rule. The term "Cartesian" typically refers to a coordinate system rather than a tensor or vector, which are inherently coordinate-independent. In a 3 x 3 Cartesian coordinate system, the matrix in question serves as the tensor's representation within that framework. Clarification is provided that "Cartesian tensor" refers to this specific representation in Cartesian coordinates.
hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
Each set of constant numbers such as ##(v_1, v_2, v_3)## are the components of a constant Cartesian vector because by rotation of coordinates they satisfy the transformation rule. Can we consider each set of constant arrays ## a_{ij};i,j=1,2,3 ## as components of a Cartesian tensor? In other words, does each set of this type satisfy the tensor transformation rule?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by a Cartesian tensor? Cartesian is usually used to refer to a coordinate system, not a tensor, or a vector, both of which are coordinate-independent objects.
Given any 3 x 3 Cartesian coordinate system, the matrix you mention will be the representation in that coordinate system of a tensor.
 
andrewkirk said:
What do you mean by a Cartesian tensor? Cartesian is usually used to refer to a coordinate system, not a tensor, or a vector, both of which are coordinate-independent objects.
Given any 3 x 3 Cartesian coordinate system, the matrix you mention will be the representation in that coordinate system of a tensor.
Thanks. By "Cartesian tensor" I meant the representation of a tensor in Cartesian coordinate system.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top