MHB Tensor Products - Issue with Cooperstein, Theorem 10.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Bruce N. Coopersteins book: Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition) ... ...

I am focused on Section 10.2 Properties of Tensor Products ... ...

I need help with an aspect of the proof of Theorem 10.3 ... ... basically I do not know what is going on in the second part of the proof, after the isomorphism between $$X$$ and $$Y$$ is proven ... ... ... ... Theorem 10.3 reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5477
View attachment 5478
View attachment 5479Question 1


In the above proof by Cooperstein, we read the following:" ... ... ... it follows that $$S$$ and $$T$$ are inverses of each other and consequently $$X$$ and $$Y$$ are isomorphic. ... ... ""Surely, at this point the theorem is proven ... but the proof goes on ... ... ?

Can someone please explain what is going on in the second part of the proof ... ... ?
Question 2

In the above proof we read:"... ... Then $$g (w_1, \ ... \ ... \ , w_t)$$ is a multilinear map and therefore by the universality of $$V$$ there exists a linear map $$\sigma (w_1, \ ... \ ... \ , w_t)$$ from $$V$$ to $$Y$$ ... ... "

My question is as follows:

What is meant by the universality of $$V$$" and how does the universality of $$V$$ lead to the existence of the linear map $$\sigma$$ ... ... ?Hope someone can help ... ... Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
He is referring to the universal mapping property of the tensor product, which guarantees the existence of such a map, since the tensor product (by its defining UMP) turns a multilinear map:

$g:V_1 \times \cdots \times V_s \to Y$

into a LINEAR map:

$L: V_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes V_s \to Y$

(equivalently, we have $L$ is the unique linear map such that $L \circ \otimes = g$)

Note that we get a *different* $g$ for each element of $W_1 \times \cdots \times W_t$. Thus for each:

$\omega \in W_1 \times \cdot \times W_n$, we have the multilinear function $\omega \mapsto L_{\omega}$, which when we tensor the $W$'s, induces the linear function $\sigma$.

The proof *would* be done when we show $S,T$ inverses, but the existence of $S$ needs to be established, which is what the second half of the proof is doing. This existence is shown by invoking the UMP three separate times, for different vector spaces.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top